广州大学学报:社会科学版
廣州大學學報:社會科學版
엄주대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Guangzhou University(Social Science Edition)
2015年
2期
5~11
,共null页
反腐败 廉政管理 地方创新
反腐敗 廉政管理 地方創新
반부패 렴정관리 지방창신
anti-corruption ; integrity management ; local innovation
以从广东省搜集的地方反腐创新案例作为分析样本,探讨以地方为基础的廉政管理的策略意义及其对反腐制度转型的推动作用,提出“以地方为基础的廉政管理”这一概念。按照经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的定义,“廉政管理”指的是加强廉洁建设、防止腐败和其他有违廉政的行为所实施的管理措施和活动。廉政管理的主要目的是预防腐败,即防患于未然,而不仅仅是抑制已发生的腐败情况。它可以是自上而下地按中央指令进行,也可以通过以地方为主自下而上的创新探索方式推进。前者需要在执行中央法规和命令时兼顾和协调不同地区的差异性,而后者则允许地方在廉政建设的机构、过程和方式上进行变通和调整。最近几年,地方廉政创新开始陆续出现,并且逐渐获得中央的认可和鼓励。这是行之有效的廉政建设途径。在大力治标的同时,必须综合施策,强化治本,才能有效确保治标之成果,提升国家法治建设之水平,奠定社会长治久安之基础。
以從廣東省搜集的地方反腐創新案例作為分析樣本,探討以地方為基礎的廉政管理的策略意義及其對反腐製度轉型的推動作用,提齣“以地方為基礎的廉政管理”這一概唸。按照經濟閤作與髮展組織(OECD)的定義,“廉政管理”指的是加彊廉潔建設、防止腐敗和其他有違廉政的行為所實施的管理措施和活動。廉政管理的主要目的是預防腐敗,即防患于未然,而不僅僅是抑製已髮生的腐敗情況。它可以是自上而下地按中央指令進行,也可以通過以地方為主自下而上的創新探索方式推進。前者需要在執行中央法規和命令時兼顧和協調不同地區的差異性,而後者則允許地方在廉政建設的機構、過程和方式上進行變通和調整。最近幾年,地方廉政創新開始陸續齣現,併且逐漸穫得中央的認可和鼓勵。這是行之有效的廉政建設途徑。在大力治標的同時,必鬚綜閤施策,彊化治本,纔能有效確保治標之成果,提升國傢法治建設之水平,奠定社會長治久安之基礎。
이종광동성수집적지방반부창신안례작위분석양본,탐토이지방위기출적렴정관리적책략의의급기대반부제도전형적추동작용,제출“이지방위기출적렴정관리”저일개념。안조경제합작여발전조직(OECD)적정의,“렴정관리”지적시가강렴길건설、방지부패화기타유위렴정적행위소실시적관리조시화활동。렴정관리적주요목적시예방부패,즉방환우미연,이불부부시억제이발생적부패정황。타가이시자상이하지안중앙지령진행,야가이통과이지방위주자하이상적창신탐색방식추진。전자수요재집행중앙법규화명령시겸고화협조불동지구적차이성,이후자칙윤허지방재렴정건설적궤구、과정화방식상진행변통화조정。최근궤년,지방렴정창신개시륙속출현,병차축점획득중앙적인가화고려。저시행지유효적렴정건설도경。재대력치표적동시,필수종합시책,강화치본,재능유효학보치표지성과,제승국가법치건설지수평,전정사회장치구안지기출。
Drawing on the authors' fieldwork in Guangdong, this article investigates the implications of developing integrity management at local levels for clean governance in China. The authors adopt the concept of integrity management coined by the OECD to refer to strategies and activities undertaken by governments to stimulate and enforce integrity with a view to preventing corruption and other integrity violations. Different from efforts to control existing corruption, the purpose of integrity management is to prevent corruption from taking place. Integrity management may be carried out in a top-down compliance-based fashion or a locally based bottom-up manner. While the former demands sweeping conformity and uniformity across different localities in implementing central rules and directives, the latter allows local variation in integrity structures, processes, and methods. In recent years, burgeoning and disparate local integrity innovations began to emerge and have been generally encouraged by the Center. The authors believe that developing locally based integrity management is an effective way toward clean governance. While it is important to crack down on existing corruption cases, more comprehensive measures should be taken to pursue profound institutional reform, to promote the rule of law, and to lay a solid foundation for social order and stability.