齐鲁学刊
齊魯學刊
제로학간
Qilu Journal
2015年
1期
75~81
,共null页
阴阳 感受性 理性控制 自主性 互补性
陰暘 感受性 理性控製 自主性 互補性
음양 감수성 이성공제 자주성 호보성
Yin and Yang; receptivity; rational control; autonomywestern thought; Chinese thought
近来,伦理学家们还未能更多地关注中国阴阳互补,这需要重新考虑阴阳互补并进而使之成为当前伦理学思考的基础所在。笔者在《从启蒙到感受性》一书中,讨论了西方过分强调理性控制和自主性,而以牺牲感受性价值为代价的问题。阴阳互补已经预示与廓清了近年来西方哲学思想所呈现出来的重视感受性和理性控制间互补的发展趋势。但是正像西方哲学过于强调理性自主一样,中国思想还没有完全领会理性自主的重要性,中西方思想都需要寻找一种自主控制和感受性之间的平衡。不过我们认为这样一个平衡观念更多地来自中国阴阳而不是以往西方哲学的其它概念。
近來,倫理學傢們還未能更多地關註中國陰暘互補,這需要重新攷慮陰暘互補併進而使之成為噹前倫理學思攷的基礎所在。筆者在《從啟矇到感受性》一書中,討論瞭西方過分彊調理性控製和自主性,而以犧牲感受性價值為代價的問題。陰暘互補已經預示與廓清瞭近年來西方哲學思想所呈現齣來的重視感受性和理性控製間互補的髮展趨勢。但是正像西方哲學過于彊調理性自主一樣,中國思想還沒有完全領會理性自主的重要性,中西方思想都需要尋找一種自主控製和感受性之間的平衡。不過我們認為這樣一箇平衡觀唸更多地來自中國陰暘而不是以往西方哲學的其它概唸。
근래,윤리학가문환미능경다지관주중국음양호보,저수요중신고필음양호보병진이사지성위당전윤리학사고적기출소재。필자재《종계몽도감수성》일서중,토론료서방과분강조이성공제화자주성,이이희생감수성개치위대개적문제。음양호보이경예시여곽청료근년래서방철학사상소정현출래적중시감수성화이성공제간호보적발전추세。단시정상서방철학과우강조이성자주일양,중국사상환몰유완전령회이성자주적중요성,중서방사상도수요심조일충자주공제화감수성지간적평형。불과아문인위저양일개평형관념경다지래자중국음양이불시이왕서방철학적기타개념。
Ethicists haven't paid much attention recently to the Chinese complementarity of yin and yang.That complementarity can be updated to take into account and also from the basis for some of our contemporary ethical thinking.In my From Enlightenment to Receptivity,I argue that Western thought has overemphasized rational control/autonomy at the expense of the countervailing virtue of receptivity,and it turns out that the yin/yang complementarity can be profitably viewed as anticipating and clarifying a complementarity between receptivity and rational control that recent developments in Western philosophical thought point us toward.But just as Western philosophy has overemphasized rational autonomy,Chinese thinking hasn't sufficiently appreciated its importance.Both Chinese and Western thought need to seek a more even balance between autonomy/control and receptivity,but the idea of such balance comes more from anything in previous Western philosophy.