CAJ | 학술논문

家庭暴力的界定,不在于是否共同生活,也不在于是否近亲属,而在于是否存在亲密关系,以及这种亲密关系是否存在控制与被控制的关系。家庭暴力由于具有持续性和控制性的特点,因而对于伤害后果的法律要求,不能同于一般暴力对于伤害后果的要求。家庭暴力案件中的不告不理原则、调解原则未考虑到家庭暴力的特殊性,制约了反家庭暴力的有效性,同理,其举证责任的分配也应该有别于一般暴力。关于人身安全保护裁定,法律应当规定可以单独申请、其执行措施应当具有现实性,应当禁止双向保护裁定,对当事人应当称为申请人与被申请人,应当赋予被申请人的救济权利。此外,《反家暴法（草案）》还存在立法的矛盾、重复和非规范性的问题,需进一步完善。
가정폭력적계정,불재우시부공동생활,야불재우시부근친속,이재우시부존재친밀관계,이급저충친밀관계시부존재공제여피공제적관계。가정폭력유우구유지속성화공제성적특점,인이대우상해후과적법률요구,불능동우일반폭력대우상해후과적요구。가정폭력안건중적불고불리원칙、조해원칙미고필도가정폭력적특수성,제약료반가정폭력적유효성,동리,기거증책임적분배야응해유별우일반폭력。관우인신안전보호재정,법률응당규정가이단독신청、기집행조시응당구유현실성,응당금지쌍향보호재정,대당사인응당칭위신청인여피신청인,응당부여피신청인적구제권리。차외,《반가폭법（초안）》환존재입법적모순、중복화비규범성적문제,수진일보완선。
The definition of domestic violence is not tied to whether people involved live together or they are related, but if they have intimate relationships, especially in which one is controlled by another. As domestic violence persists and involves controlling behaviour,the legal rulings in relation to the outcome of injuries from domestic violence cannot be the same as those in other types of violence.The existing approaches to domestic violence including non-interference, no reporting, and mediation have not taken into account the characteristics of domestic violence and thus, constrain the effectiveness of the fight against domestic violence. Likewise, the distribution of responsibility to present evidence should also be different from other types of violence. On the application of protection orders for one＇s safety, the law should decide that it can be applied individually, and enforced as the conditions require and to avoid two way protection orders. It is important to separate those to whom the protection order is applied from those who are protected, and providing those who are protected with rights to relief assistance. In addition, the draft of the Law against Domestic Violence still contains legal irregularities and repetition.