CAJ | 학술논문

《国际体育仲裁院仲裁规则》第58条规定了其上诉程序的法律适用的选择,但这一条款在仲裁实践中的运用仍然存在诸多不确定之处,如体育机构规章与当事人选择的法律规则间的关系,如何确定仲裁庭认为适用的法律规则的适用等,这些问题在新版中部分明确,但仍需要通过研究CAS的判例来加以理解,从应然层面说,新版的表述体现了CAS的仲裁实践经验,也符合体育的本质。
《국제체육중재원중재규칙》제58조규정료기상소정서적법률괄용적선택,단저일조관재중재실천중적운용잉연존재제다불학정지처,여체육궤구규장여당사인선택적법률규칙간적관계,여하학정중재정인위괄용적법률규칙적괄용등,저사문제재신판중부분명학,단잉수요통과연구CAS적판례래가이리해,종응연층면설,신판적표술체현료CAS적중재실천경험,야부합체육적본질。
Article 58 of Arbitration Code of Court of Arbitration for Sports provides its choice of laws for the appeal procedures.However,there are still many uncertainties in its provision.For instance,the relationships between rules and regulations of the sports organizations and rules of law chosen by the parties,and how to ascertain the appropriate rules of law arbitration tribunal deems are not clear.Even though they are partially defined in the new version,which reflects the CAS arbitration practices,they need to be interpreted by the CAS arbitration jurisprudence.