CAJ | 학술논문

＂证明＂一词在佩雷尔曼的新修辞学中具有双重含义,其一指主要在数学领域中使用的演证,其二指主要在人文学科领域中使用的论证。演证与论证既相互区别又彼此联系,这一特点在所谓＂准逻辑＂论证中有集中的反映。按照与形式逻辑推理或数学推理的相似性,准逻辑论证可区分为两大类11种,具有＂似逻辑而又非形式＂的性质。相异于佩雷尔曼认为准逻辑论证的结构不能被形式化,本文指出,它们可以在巴斯和克雷伯＂形式3＂的意义上被形式化,即有其论证型式;运用相应的批判性问题,可对这些论证的确信力进行评估。
＂증명＂일사재패뢰이만적신수사학중구유쌍중함의,기일지주요재수학영역중사용적연증,기이지주요재인문학과영역중사용적론증。연증여론증기상호구별우피차련계,저일특점재소위＂준라집＂론증중유집중적반영。안조여형식라집추리혹수학추리적상사성,준라집론증가구분위량대류11충,구유＂사라집이우비형식＂적성질。상이우패뢰이만인위준라집론증적결구불능피형식화,본문지출,타문가이재파사화극뢰백＂형식3＂적의의상피형식화,즉유기론증형식;운용상응적비판성문제,가대저사론증적학신력진행평고。
In the New Rhetoric, the word ＂to prove＂ has a double meaning： one is called demonstration, which is the method of ＂prove＂ used in the field of mathematics; the other is called argumentation, which is the method of＂prove＂ used in the field of human- ities. There are differences and connections between the two kinds of usage, which can be fully reflected in the so-called ＂quasi-logical argumentation＂. According to the rea- soning similar to formal logic or mathematics, quasi-logical argumentations were divided into two major categories and eleven kinds of argumentation, which have the character- istic of ＂like logic and non-formal＂. This paper points out that quasi-logical argumen- tation can be formalized in Barth ＆ Krabbe＇s form3, namely, it has the argumentation scheme, which is different from Perelman＇s thought that the structure of quasi-logical argumentations could not be formalized. And we can evaluate the convincing of these argumentations with the corresponding critical questions.