徐州工程学院学报:社会科学版
徐州工程學院學報:社會科學版
서주공정학원학보:사회과학판
Journal of Xuzhou Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
2015年
2期
23~32
,共null页
明实录 王竑 历史书写
明實錄 王竑 歷史書寫
명실록 왕횡 역사서사
Ming Memoir ; Wang Hong; historical documentaries
王竑的仕途与大明帝国正统、景泰、天顺和成化的历史相伴而行,甚至是当时一系列重大事件的历史见证,其个人历史直接构成了明朝国史的部分内容。《明实录》作为明朝的编年国史,以时间为线索,鲜明地记载和反映了王竑在每一个阶段的成就。书中对王竑的肯定和惋惜,反映了《英宗实录》、《宪宗实录》和《孝宗实录》的史臣们对他的正面认识,也是对当时士大夫们对王竑评价的承载和记录。当然,无论是皇帝、士大夫还是史臣,他们对王竑的重视,又与王竑个人在景泰、天顺、成化、弘治间的历史功绩密不可分。这说明,历史的书写虽然与书写者的价值取向紧密相关,但也或多或少受制于客观的历史事实。
王竑的仕途與大明帝國正統、景泰、天順和成化的歷史相伴而行,甚至是噹時一繫列重大事件的歷史見證,其箇人歷史直接構成瞭明朝國史的部分內容。《明實錄》作為明朝的編年國史,以時間為線索,鮮明地記載和反映瞭王竑在每一箇階段的成就。書中對王竑的肯定和惋惜,反映瞭《英宗實錄》、《憲宗實錄》和《孝宗實錄》的史臣們對他的正麵認識,也是對噹時士大伕們對王竑評價的承載和記錄。噹然,無論是皇帝、士大伕還是史臣,他們對王竑的重視,又與王竑箇人在景泰、天順、成化、弘治間的歷史功績密不可分。這說明,歷史的書寫雖然與書寫者的價值取嚮緊密相關,但也或多或少受製于客觀的歷史事實。
왕횡적사도여대명제국정통、경태、천순화성화적역사상반이행,심지시당시일계렬중대사건적역사견증,기개인역사직접구성료명조국사적부분내용。《명실록》작위명조적편년국사,이시간위선색,선명지기재화반영료왕횡재매일개계단적성취。서중대왕횡적긍정화완석,반영료《영종실록》、《헌종실록》화《효종실록》적사신문대타적정면인식,야시대당시사대부문대왕횡평개적승재화기록。당연,무론시황제、사대부환시사신,타문대왕횡적중시,우여왕횡개인재경태、천순、성화、홍치간적역사공적밀불가분。저설명,역사적서사수연여서사자적개치취향긴밀상관,단야혹다혹소수제우객관적역사사실。
Wang HonKs official career, accompanied by the history of the Zhengtong,Jingtai, Tianshun and Chenghua of the Ming Empires,witnessed a series of major events of his time, and constituted part of the national history of the Ming Dynasty. Ming Memoir, which was the chronological national history of Ming Dynasty,clearly documented and reflected Wang HonKs achievements in each stage in chronological order as well. Its recognition and regrets to Wang Hong not only reflected the positive comments of the historiographers who wrote Yingzong Memoir, Xianzong Memoir and Xiaozong Memoir,but also recorded the officers' evaluations on him, which, of course, were inseparable from his historical achievements. It showed that the historical documentaries, though closely related to the writers; own value orientations, were more or less limited by the objective historical facts.