海南大学学报:人文社会科学版
海南大學學報:人文社會科學版
해남대학학보:인문사회과학판
Humanities & Social Sciences Journal of Hainan University
2015年
2期
1~7
,共null页
古今之争 文艺复兴 布拉乔利尼 马基雅维利 勒华
古今之爭 文藝複興 佈拉喬利尼 馬基雅維利 勒華
고금지쟁 문예복흥 포랍교리니 마기아유리 륵화
The Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns; Renaissance; Poggio Bracciolini; Niccolo Machiavelli; Le Roy Ladurie
17世纪末至18世纪初,欧洲知识界一场持续了半个世纪的"古今之争"不仅是文艺复兴与启蒙运动之间的连接点,而且标示出现代西方文明史的基本格局。然而,"古今之争"与"文艺复兴"两个文化史事件之间的内在关联究竟如何?通过分析布拉乔利尼、马基雅维利、勒华三位文艺复兴时期的人文主义学者及其论述,可说明文艺复兴的一个重要面相,进而阐明文艺复兴与古今之争的内在关联:"文艺复兴"时期西欧各日耳曼王国和城市共和国作为新政治单元的形成,是抑古崇今风气的真正起因,即是引发"古今之争"的生存论原因。
17世紀末至18世紀初,歐洲知識界一場持續瞭半箇世紀的"古今之爭"不僅是文藝複興與啟矇運動之間的連接點,而且標示齣現代西方文明史的基本格跼。然而,"古今之爭"與"文藝複興"兩箇文化史事件之間的內在關聯究竟如何?通過分析佈拉喬利尼、馬基雅維利、勒華三位文藝複興時期的人文主義學者及其論述,可說明文藝複興的一箇重要麵相,進而闡明文藝複興與古今之爭的內在關聯:"文藝複興"時期西歐各日耳曼王國和城市共和國作為新政治單元的形成,是抑古崇今風氣的真正起因,即是引髮"古今之爭"的生存論原因。
17세기말지18세기초,구주지식계일장지속료반개세기적"고금지쟁"불부시문예복흥여계몽운동지간적련접점,이차표시출현대서방문명사적기본격국。연이,"고금지쟁"여"문예복흥"량개문화사사건지간적내재관련구경여하?통과분석포랍교리니、마기아유리、륵화삼위문예복흥시기적인문주의학자급기논술,가설명문예복흥적일개중요면상,진이천명문예복흥여고금지쟁적내재관련:"문예복흥"시기서구각일이만왕국화성시공화국작위신정치단원적형성,시억고숭금풍기적진정기인,즉시인발"고금지쟁"적생존론원인。
The Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns began overtly as a literary and artistic debate heated up within European academia in the late 17 th century and continued to early 18 th century. This debate does not only connect Renaissance and Enlightenment,but also reveal the configuration of western modernization. Given this significance,however,the question of how this debate and Renaissance were connected remain undiscovered. By analyzing three significant figures and their works in Renaissance period,namely,Poggio Bracciolini,Niccolo Machiavelli,and Le Roy Ladurie,I find the connection lies in the emergence of a new kind of political unit——various Germanic kingdoms and republics in western Europe,which is the real reason for the quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns.