CAJ | 학술논문

澳大利亚刑事诉讼证据规则中,刑事推定包括事实推定与法律推定,法律推定之中又涵盖可反驳的法律推定与不可反驳的法律推定。为了让证据在控辩双方中充分博弈使其越辩越明,刑事推定中的多数推定都是可反驳的推定,不可反驳的法律推定类型往往很少且逐渐成文化。可反驳的（事实与法律）推定之间常常存有冲突,各种可反驳的证据之间并无优劣顺序之分,解决冲突的路径则交由控辩双方的证明责任,法官依举证责任的分配来确定采取哪方证据。
오대리아형사소송증거규칙중,형사추정포괄사실추정여법률추정,법률추정지중우함개가반박적법률추정여불가반박적법률추정。위료양증거재공변쌍방중충분박혁사기월변월명,형사추정중적다수추정도시가반박적추정,불가반박적법률추정류형왕왕흔소차축점성문화。가반박적（사실여법률）추정지간상상존유충돌,각충가반박적증거지간병무우렬순서지분,해결충돌적로경칙교유공변쌍방적증명책임,법관의거증책임적분배래학정채취나방증거。
Australian evidence law, criminal presumptions include presumptions of fact and presumptions of law. Presumptions of law includes rebuttable and irrebuttable presumptions of law. The significant majority of presumptions in crime are rebuttable presumptions. Irrebuttable presumptions are very few and now almost all of them have been provided in statutes. Rebuttable of presumptions of fact and law may be perceived to conflict. There is no importance ranking among all of those types of presumptions. In reality, the Court does not directly give their preference to particular presumptions. Rather they try to resolve the burden of proof. So once one party relies on a rebuttable p party needs to show evidence to rebut it. Failure to rebut losing the action. The party failing to discharge his or he the action. problem by allocating resumption, then the other does not r burden necessarily mean of proof will lose