CAJ | 학술논문

我国船舶保全的有关规定设立之初是为了满足海事诉讼的需要,并不能完全适用于仲裁程序。且仲裁程序下的船舶保全,因可能涉及国家间的司法协助及各个国家对仲裁与法院权力的不同分配而较之诉讼下的船舶保全更为复杂。我国《民事诉讼法》、《海事诉讼特别程序法》、《仲裁法》关于仲裁程序下船舶保全的规定并不完善且缺乏一定的合理性,可能会造成司法实践中的困难。在对有关困境进行深入探讨的基础上对相关法律修改提出合理化建议。
아국선박보전적유관규정설립지초시위료만족해사소송적수요,병불능완전괄용우중재정서。차중재정서하적선박보전,인가능섭급국가간적사법협조급각개국가대중재여법원권력적불동분배이교지소송하적선박보전경위복잡。아국《민사소송법》、《해사소송특별정서법》、《중재법》관우중재정서하선박보전적규정병불완선차결핍일정적합이성,가능회조성사법실천중적곤난。재대유관곤경진행심입탐토적기출상대상관법률수개제출합이화건의。
As the purpose of the preservation of ships is to fulfill the demanding of maritime court proceedings, the provisions related don ＇t suit the arbitration proceedings properly. In addition to that, The preservation of ships in arbitration, which may involve cross-border judicial assistance and power division between courts and arbitrations in different countries, is more complicated than the preservation of ships before courts. Difficulties may arise in judicial practice, for the provisions regarding the preservation of ships in arbitration stipulated in Civil Procedural Law of the PRC, Special Maritime limited and some discussion should Procedural Law of the PRC, Arbitration Law of them are not very reasonable. Suggestions be presented. of the PRC are so on the base of full