中国人口资源与环境
中國人口資源與環境
중국인구자원여배경
China Polulation.Resources and Environment
2015年
4期
101~109
,共null页
环境政策 宏观经济波动 不确定因素 DSGE模型
環境政策 宏觀經濟波動 不確定因素 DSGE模型
배경정책 굉관경제파동 불학정인소 DSGE모형
environmental policy; macroeconomic fluctuations; uncertain factor; DSGE model
空气污染已成为当前政府和公众面临的一个突出问题,选择并实施有效的环境政策是解决这一问题的关键。为此,本文通过引入空气污染排放变量和环境政策变量对经典的新凯恩斯DSGE模型进行拓展,基于拓展后的模型从经济增长和经济波动两个视角并结合数值求解法对限额排放、强度目标制以及污染排放税等三种环境政策进行比较分析。分析结果显示,在经济增长视角下,污染排放税政策优于限额排放和强度目标制政策;在减少经济波动视角下,限额排放政策应是优先选取的政策机制。与此同时,环境政策的选择还受经济中不确定因素来源的影响,当不确定因素来源于技术创新时,限额排放政策为优选政策;当不确定因素来源于政府消费支出或货币政策调控时,三种环境政策间无明显差异。政府应致力于将环境政策的制定和实施植入到整个宏观经济的发展中,考虑环境政策对经济增长和波动的影响,即环境政策实施的经济成本;做到环境政策决策基于宏观经济,根据不同的经济发展阶段、目标和现状恰当的选择环境政策工具,以优化环境政策实施效果。
空氣汙染已成為噹前政府和公衆麵臨的一箇突齣問題,選擇併實施有效的環境政策是解決這一問題的關鍵。為此,本文通過引入空氣汙染排放變量和環境政策變量對經典的新凱恩斯DSGE模型進行拓展,基于拓展後的模型從經濟增長和經濟波動兩箇視角併結閤數值求解法對限額排放、彊度目標製以及汙染排放稅等三種環境政策進行比較分析。分析結果顯示,在經濟增長視角下,汙染排放稅政策優于限額排放和彊度目標製政策;在減少經濟波動視角下,限額排放政策應是優先選取的政策機製。與此同時,環境政策的選擇還受經濟中不確定因素來源的影響,噹不確定因素來源于技術創新時,限額排放政策為優選政策;噹不確定因素來源于政府消費支齣或貨幣政策調控時,三種環境政策間無明顯差異。政府應緻力于將環境政策的製定和實施植入到整箇宏觀經濟的髮展中,攷慮環境政策對經濟增長和波動的影響,即環境政策實施的經濟成本;做到環境政策決策基于宏觀經濟,根據不同的經濟髮展階段、目標和現狀恰噹的選擇環境政策工具,以優化環境政策實施效果。
공기오염이성위당전정부화공음면림적일개돌출문제,선택병실시유효적배경정책시해결저일문제적관건。위차,본문통과인입공기오염배방변량화배경정책변량대경전적신개은사DSGE모형진행탁전,기우탁전후적모형종경제증장화경제파동량개시각병결합수치구해법대한액배방、강도목표제이급오염배방세등삼충배경정책진행비교분석。분석결과현시,재경제증장시각하,오염배방세정책우우한액배방화강도목표제정책;재감소경제파동시각하,한액배방정책응시우선선취적정책궤제。여차동시,배경정책적선택환수경제중불학정인소래원적영향,당불학정인소래원우기술창신시,한액배방정책위우선정책;당불학정인소래원우정부소비지출혹화폐정책조공시,삼충배경정책간무명현차이。정부응치력우장배경정책적제정화실시식입도정개굉관경제적발전중,고필배경정책대경제증장화파동적영향,즉배경정책실시적경제성본;주도배경정책결책기우굉관경제,근거불동적경제발전계단、목표화현상흡당적선택배경정책공구,이우화배경정책실시효과。
Air pollution has become a prominent problem faced by the current government and the public,and the key to solve this problem is the selection and implementation of effective environmental polices. This paper,by introducing air pollution variables and environmental policy variables,expanded classic new Keynesian DSGE model,based on the expanded model from the perspective of both economic growth and economic fluctuations combined with numerical solution method to comparative analysis emissions cap policy,intensity target policy and emission tax policy. The results show that emission tax policy is better than emissions cap policy and intensity target policy in the perspective of economic growth; while,emissions cap policy should be a priority selection mechanism in the perspective of reducing economic fluctuations. Meanwhile,the choice of environmental policy is influenced by the source of uncertainty in the economy. When the uncertainty comes from the technology innovation,emissions cap policy is optimal policy; when the uncertainty comes from government spending or the monetary policy,there are no significant differences between these three types of environmental policy. The government should take the formulation and implementation of environmental policy under the whole macro economic development,considering the influence of environmental policy on economic growth and fluctuation,that is to say the economic costs of the implementation of environmental policy. Selecting environmental policy instruments correctly according to the stages,goals and status of the economic development,can optimize the effect of environment policy implementation.