CAJ | 학술논문

批判法学的不同代表人物大多主张司法的政治性命题，即司法判决本质上不是基于法律因素而作出的，而是基于政治意识形态因素而作出的。在批判法学看来，司法的政治性是自由主义社会价值多元化必然的结果，其间的逻辑关系在于：自由主义的价值多元化必然导致立法反映不同的价值，这就造成法律体系的内在不一致，自由主义的法律体系就像一个七拼八凑的大杂烩；而内在不一致甚至相互矛盾的立法使得司法过程中法官可以并且必须按照自己的意识形态来选择适用法律，这就又导致了政治性的司法。所以，割据的立法、政治性的司法，都是自由主义社会的必然产物。
비판법학적불동대표인물대다주장사법적정치성명제，즉사법판결본질상불시기우법률인소이작출적，이시기우정치의식형태인소이작출적。재비판법학간래，사법적정치성시자유주의사회개치다원화필연적결과，기간적라집관계재우：자유주의적개치다원화필연도치입법반영불동적개치，저취조성법률체계적내재불일치，자유주의적법률체계취상일개칠병팔주적대잡회；이내재불일치심지상호모순적입법사득사법과정중법관가이병차필수안조자기적의식형태래선택괄용법률，저취우도치료정치성적사법。소이，할거적입법、정치성적사법，도시자유주의사회적필연산물。
Most CLS theorists hold the view that the justice is political, which means that the judicial decisions are based not on legal considerations but on political ideology. According to CLS, political justice inevitably results from the value pluralism of Liberalism. Here the logical relationship lies in that the value pluralism of Liberalism will lead to different values from legislation, which will result in the inate inconsistency of the legal system; thus, as CLS has pointed out, the legal system of Liberalism is like a patchwork hodgepodge. In the judicial process, the inconsistent and even conflicting laws require judges to choose an applicable law according to their own ideology, which will lead to political justice. Therefore, the paradoxical laws and political justice are the inevitable product of Liberalism.