CAJ | 학술논문

假设性推理是相对于演绎推理和归纳推理提出的“第三类推理”，其基本特征主要体现在前提的不完备性、结论的非单调性和过程的对话性上。法律推理是一种在特定语境中进行的言语交际活动。正是语境如影随形地影响着法律推理的整个言语进程，法律推理才呈现出假设性的特征，作为假设性推理而存在。假设性法律推理的提出并不是对法律推理其他逻辑形式的否定，而是对法律推理逻辑属性的进一步认识和深化。在追求确定性和可预测性的基础上，肯认法律推理的假设性，法律推理就有了更加全面而统一的逻辑基础。
가설성추리시상대우연역추리화귀납추리제출적“제삼유추리”，기기본특정주요체현재전제적불완비성、결론적비단조성화과정적대화성상。법률추리시일충재특정어경중진행적언어교제활동。정시어경여영수형지영향착법률추리적정개언어진정，법률추리재정현출가설성적특정，작위가설성추리이존재。가설성법률추리적제출병불시대법률추리기타라집형식적부정，이시대법률추리라집속성적진일보인식화심화。재추구학정성화가예측성적기출상，긍인법률추리적가설성，법률추리취유료경가전면이통일적라집기출。
Hypothetical reasoning is ＂the third type of reasoning＂ which is relative to deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning and whose basic characteristics are mainly embodied in the imperfect premise, the non-monotonic conclusion and the dialogic process. Legal reasoning is a kind of verbal communication activity in a specific context. It is the context that affects the entire speech process in legal reasoning which presents hypothetical traits, existing as hypothetical reasoning. Hypothetical legal reasoning is not a denial to other legal reasoning logic forms, but a further understanding of legal reasoning logic properties. Based on pursuing certainty and predictability, hypothetical legal reasoning is affirmed, which provides a more comprehensive and unified logic basis.