中南大学学报:社会科学版
中南大學學報:社會科學版
중남대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Central South Huiversity: Social Science
2015年
2期
222~227
,共null页
网络多媒体诗歌 全息 审美形态
網絡多媒體詩歌 全息 審美形態
망락다매체시가 전식 심미형태
network multimedia poetry; holography; aesthetic form
与传统诗歌的审美形态相比,由于网络多媒体诗歌的传播媒介和创作载体的不同,自然形成了不同于传统诗歌的全息的审美形态。无论是台湾还是大陆的多媒体诗歌,尽管地域的不同导致在多媒体诗歌的审美赋型的过程中呈现出不同的审美形态,但如果采取求同存异的方式,取审美形态的全息性这一网络诗歌最核心的艺术表征而言,还是有许多共同之处的。具体表现在三个方面:首先,多种异质的审美元素的相互融合构成了多媒体诗歌最为鲜明的艺术表征;其次,这种动态的、虚拟的审美形态和文本互动的方式是以往任何一种诗歌形式所没有的;最后,多媒体诗歌最鲜明的形象直观的表征也是纸质诗歌所无法比拟的。不可否认的是多媒体诗歌的图像和音频在为诗歌提供感官的审美效果的同时,作为一柄双刃剑也对诗歌的审美功能造成了一定的伤害。
與傳統詩歌的審美形態相比,由于網絡多媒體詩歌的傳播媒介和創作載體的不同,自然形成瞭不同于傳統詩歌的全息的審美形態。無論是檯灣還是大陸的多媒體詩歌,儘管地域的不同導緻在多媒體詩歌的審美賦型的過程中呈現齣不同的審美形態,但如果採取求同存異的方式,取審美形態的全息性這一網絡詩歌最覈心的藝術錶徵而言,還是有許多共同之處的。具體錶現在三箇方麵:首先,多種異質的審美元素的相互融閤構成瞭多媒體詩歌最為鮮明的藝術錶徵;其次,這種動態的、虛擬的審美形態和文本互動的方式是以往任何一種詩歌形式所沒有的;最後,多媒體詩歌最鮮明的形象直觀的錶徵也是紙質詩歌所無法比擬的。不可否認的是多媒體詩歌的圖像和音頻在為詩歌提供感官的審美效果的同時,作為一柄雙刃劍也對詩歌的審美功能造成瞭一定的傷害。
여전통시가적심미형태상비,유우망락다매체시가적전파매개화창작재체적불동,자연형성료불동우전통시가적전식적심미형태。무론시태만환시대륙적다매체시가,진관지역적불동도치재다매체시가적심미부형적과정중정현출불동적심미형태,단여과채취구동존이적방식,취심미형태적전식성저일망락시가최핵심적예술표정이언,환시유허다공동지처적。구체표현재삼개방면:수선,다충이질적심미원소적상호융합구성료다매체시가최위선명적예술표정;기차,저충동태적、허의적심미형태화문본호동적방식시이왕임하일충시가형식소몰유적;최후,다매체시가최선명적형상직관적표정야시지질시가소무법비의적。불가부인적시다매체시가적도상화음빈재위시가제공감관적심미효과적동시,작위일병쌍인검야대시가적심미공능조성료일정적상해。
Compared with traditional poetry in terms of the aesthetic form, the network multimedia poetry has its own different communication media and creation carrier, and the holographic aesthetic form is hence formed which is different from that of the traditional poetry. Different regions lead to different aesthetic forms in the process of multimedia poetry aesthetic shaping, but if we take the way of seeking the common ground while reserving differences and thus adopt the holographic aethetic form which is the core artistic representation of network poetry, the multimedia poetry either in Taiwan or in Mainland China shares many similarites. Some specific manifestations are in the following three aspects: first, the mutual fusion of various heterogeneous aesthetic elements is the most distinctive artistic representation of multimedia poetry; secondly, this dynamic and virtual mode of aesthetic form and text interaction is no longer what any kind of any form of poetry in the past had; finally, the most distinctive and vivid representation of multimedia poetry is not what the paper poetry can parallel. It is undeniable that the image and audio of multimedia poetry can provide the aesthetic effect for poetry, but at the same time bring certain damage as a double-edged sword.