CAJ | 학술논문

刑事诉讼法修改后,刑事和解制度的实施现状与预期有较大落差,其直接原因是立法失误及推动和解动力源的变化,深层原因则是对某些刑事和解理论的误读。重新解释刑事和解的本质及经济赔偿的本意,对刑事和解价值目标进行合理分流,确立公安司法机关之外的有权威的和解主持者,正确认识经济赔偿的差异性并确立赔偿的指导基准,建立补充性的国家代偿机制等将有助于刑事和解走出实践困局。
형사소송법수개후,형사화해제도적실시현상여예기유교대락차,기직접원인시입법실오급추동화해동력원적변화,심층원인칙시대모사형사화해이론적오독。중신해석형사화해적본질급경제배상적본의,대형사화해개치목표진행합리분류,학립공안사법궤관지외적유권위적화해주지자,정학인식경제배상적차이성병학립배상적지도기준,건립보충성적국가대상궤제등장유조우형사화해주출실천곤국。
There is a large gap between the current situation and the expectation of the legal community before the amending of Criminal Procedure Law, directly because of legislative misjudgment and the change of the motivation of reconciliation. But the deeper cause is some theoretical misunderstandings of criminal reconciliation. This paper proposes some practical measures to lead criminal reconciliation out of the dilemmaReinterpreting the nature of criminal reconciliation and monetary damage, reasonably splitting the values of criminal reconciliation, ensuring there are authoritative speakers besides the public security and judicial organs, correctly understanding the difference of monetary damages, establishing the guiding standards of monetary compensation, and establishing complementary national compensation system, and so on.