CAJ | 학술논문

条约解释需要考虑时间因素，然而，《维也纳条约法公约》第31．3条？项是否涉及以及是否已解决条约解释中的时际法问题，尚存疑议。该公约第31、32条并未明确规定时际原则，但该原则以间接方式蕴含于第31．3条？项中并以第31．1条中对善意的公开规定方式而间接存在。条约解释的“同时性原则”已发展为与“演进解释”原则并举。国际法的演进使得对先前条约的理解和解释通常难免借助于其后相关新条约的生效以及包括嗣后协定、嗣后惯例、准备工作等在内的诸多条约解释因素。并无解决变化了的情况影响条约解释程度之普遍性答案。
조약해석수요고필시간인소，연이，《유야납조약법공약》제31．3조？항시부섭급이급시부이해결조약해석중적시제법문제，상존의의。해공약제31、32조병미명학규정시제원칙，단해원칙이간접방식온함우제31．3조？항중병이제31．1조중대선의적공개규정방식이간접존재。조약해석적“동시성원칙”이발전위여“연진해석”원칙병거。국제법적연진사득대선전조약적리해화해석통상난면차조우기후상관신조약적생효이급포괄사후협정、사후관례、준비공작등재내적제다조약해석인소。병무해결변화료적정황영향조약해석정도지보편성답안。
The time factor needs to be considered in treaty interpretation. However, it remains controversial whether Art. 31.3 （c） of VCLT involves the intertemporal law and whether this problem has been settled. Articles 31 and 32 do not provide the principle of intertemporal law, which is implied in Art. 31.3 （c） and 31.1 through good faith in an indirect way. The principle of simultaneity in treaty interpretation has developed into the co - existence with the principle of ＂evolution＂. The evolution of international law has made it inevitably not to resort to a subsequent related new treaty as well as some interpreting elements, such as subsequent agreements, subsequent practice and preparatory work. There is no general solution to the issue of how to make the treaty interpretation adapt the changed circumstances.