国际贸易问题
國際貿易問題
국제무역문제
Journal of International Trade
2015年
4期
3~15
,共null页
装备制造业 全球价值链(GVC) Kaplinsky升级指数 全球价值链地位指数
裝備製造業 全毬價值鏈(GVC) Kaplinsky升級指數 全毬價值鏈地位指數
장비제조업 전구개치련(GVC) Kaplinsky승급지수 전구개치련지위지수
Equipment manufacturing industry; Global value chain; Kaplinsky upgrading index; Unit value of exports
本文利用Kaplinsky升级指数和中间品相对出口单价,对我国整体装备制造业在全球价值链的升级趋势和地位进行了分析,采用的数据是UN Comtrade2002-2011年HS六位编码的装备制造业产品数据。分析结果表明,中国装备制造业出口产品中大约一半金额的产品正处于升级,尤其是电信和船舶方面所取得的进步引人瞩目,出现降级的装备制造业产品数量较少,占装备制造业总出口金额的比例不到7%,总体表现远超美国、日本和德国三个装备制造业强国。从中国装备制造业企业在全球价值链的地位看,由于中国企业仍然趋向出口相对低价的装备制造业零部件,进口相对高价装备制造业零部件,因此,在全球价值链的地位总体上偏低。出口单价与世界平均价格相比,中国装备制造业的全球价值链地位指数只有0.66,与日本的2.43、德国的1.58和美国的1.42仍存在较大差距。但是值得注意的是,中国装备制造业的全球价值链地位指数呈现不断改进趋势,与2002相比,2011年地位指数提高了约43%。
本文利用Kaplinsky升級指數和中間品相對齣口單價,對我國整體裝備製造業在全毬價值鏈的升級趨勢和地位進行瞭分析,採用的數據是UN Comtrade2002-2011年HS六位編碼的裝備製造業產品數據。分析結果錶明,中國裝備製造業齣口產品中大約一半金額的產品正處于升級,尤其是電信和船舶方麵所取得的進步引人矚目,齣現降級的裝備製造業產品數量較少,佔裝備製造業總齣口金額的比例不到7%,總體錶現遠超美國、日本和德國三箇裝備製造業彊國。從中國裝備製造業企業在全毬價值鏈的地位看,由于中國企業仍然趨嚮齣口相對低價的裝備製造業零部件,進口相對高價裝備製造業零部件,因此,在全毬價值鏈的地位總體上偏低。齣口單價與世界平均價格相比,中國裝備製造業的全毬價值鏈地位指數隻有0.66,與日本的2.43、德國的1.58和美國的1.42仍存在較大差距。但是值得註意的是,中國裝備製造業的全毬價值鏈地位指數呈現不斷改進趨勢,與2002相比,2011年地位指數提高瞭約43%。
본문이용Kaplinsky승급지수화중간품상대출구단개,대아국정체장비제조업재전구개치련적승급추세화지위진행료분석,채용적수거시UN Comtrade2002-2011년HS육위편마적장비제조업산품수거。분석결과표명,중국장비제조업출구산품중대약일반금액적산품정처우승급,우기시전신화선박방면소취득적진보인인촉목,출현강급적장비제조업산품수량교소,점장비제조업총출구금액적비례불도7%,총체표현원초미국、일본화덕국삼개장비제조업강국。종중국장비제조업기업재전구개치련적지위간,유우중국기업잉연추향출구상대저개적장비제조업령부건,진구상대고개장비제조업령부건,인차,재전구개치련적지위총체상편저。출구단개여세계평균개격상비,중국장비제조업적전구개치련지위지수지유0.66,여일본적2.43、덕국적1.58화미국적1.42잉존재교대차거。단시치득주의적시,중국장비제조업적전구개치련지위지수정현불단개진추세,여2002상비,2011년지위지수제고료약43%。
In this paper, Kaplinsky upgrading index and the relative unit price of intermediate goods exports versus imports are calculated to demonstrate the upgrading trend and the current position of China' s equipment manufacturing industry in the global value chain. Data used for the analysis is based on the HS six-digit code num- bers from the UN Comtrade database from 2002 to 2011. The results suggest that ap- proximately half of the value of China' s equipment manufacturing exports, measured by the Kaplinsky index, showed significant trend of upgrading, especially in the sec- tors of telecommunications and shipbuilding. Only a small portion of the products, roughly less than 7 percent of the total export value, showed a downgrading trend. The overall performance of China' s equipment manufacturing industry had far exceed- ed that of the US, Japan and Germany. In term of the position in the global value chains, China still remained at the relative low-end compared with the developed coun- tries such as the US, Japan and Germany because China tended to export low-price in- termediate goods and import high-price ones. By comparing the export unit value with the average unit value of the world for components and parts, it is found that the unit value of components and parts exported from China was only 66 percent of the world average, whereas the unit value of the same goods from Japan, Germany and the US was 243 percent, 158 percent and 142 percent respectively. However, it should be not- ed that China' s equipment manufacturing industry had significantly improved in its position in the global capital goods value chain as the ratio of the average export unit value relative to the world had increased by 43 percent from 2002 to 2011.