知识产权
知識產權
지식산권
Intellectual Property
2015年
4期
101~106
,共null页
知识产权滥用 反垄断 私法 意思自治
知識產權濫用 反壟斷 私法 意思自治
지식산권람용 반롱단 사법 의사자치
abuse of IPR; antitrust; private law; autonomy
作为私权利行使和公权力规制的交互场,知识产权滥用问题体现了知识产权法与反垄断法在维护社会公共利益和消费者权益方面的价值趋同.由于人们通常基于知识产权的天然垄断属性予以考量,以致知识产权滥用问题的规制活动,多呈现反垄断表象.但反垄断并不是解决知识产权滥用问题的唯一手段,也并不是第一位阶的方法.司法实践中应注意到私法体系在解决知识产权滥用问题上有着很强的适格性,更不应忽视私法强大的自我调节能力,给私法自治留下必要的空间.
作為私權利行使和公權力規製的交互場,知識產權濫用問題體現瞭知識產權法與反壟斷法在維護社會公共利益和消費者權益方麵的價值趨同.由于人們通常基于知識產權的天然壟斷屬性予以攷量,以緻知識產權濫用問題的規製活動,多呈現反壟斷錶象.但反壟斷併不是解決知識產權濫用問題的唯一手段,也併不是第一位階的方法.司法實踐中應註意到私法體繫在解決知識產權濫用問題上有著很彊的適格性,更不應忽視私法彊大的自我調節能力,給私法自治留下必要的空間.
작위사권리행사화공권력규제적교호장,지식산권람용문제체현료지식산권법여반롱단법재유호사회공공이익화소비자권익방면적개치추동.유우인문통상기우지식산권적천연롱단속성여이고량,이치지식산권람용문제적규제활동,다정현반롱단표상.단반롱단병불시해결지식산권람용문제적유일수단,야병불시제일위계적방법.사법실천중응주의도사법체계재해결지식산권람용문제상유착흔강적괄격성,경불응홀시사법강대적자아조절능력,급사법자치류하필요적공간.
The issue of the abuse of intellectual property right（IPR） reflects the value identification between intellectual property law and anti-monopoly law on the protection of social public interests and consumers rights and interests in the interactive field of private right exercise and public power regulation. For the reason that the natural monopoly of IPR is the usual consideration, the regulation of the abuse of IPR has always superficially seen as antitrust. Antitrust, however, should be neither the only way nor the priority way to solve the issue. Private law system has strong adaptable capacity when solving the issue of the abuse of IPR, so it is suggested to emphasize its self-adjusting function and leave necessary room for the autonomy of private law in judicial practice.
