CAJ | 학술논문

针对自译是不是翻译这一问题，本文首先进行自译个案对比分析，即以张爱玲短篇小说《桂花蒸阿小悲秋》为例，对该汉语原作及其自译文本和他译文本进行语际对比，并基于COCA语料库分别对该自译文本、他译文本以及自译者同时代英国女作家的英文原创文本进行语内类比，然后再基于汉英自译平行语料库及其单语可比语料库对自译英语、文学他译英语和文学原创英语加以语内考察，从中窥探自译特性。文章指出：自译基本享有他译范畴的共同特性，但在“译者主体性”上比他译更显张扬；他译过程中“译”与“作”互动往往较为隐性，其中“译”是主宰，“作”为固有潜在；自译中“译”与“作”互动往往更直接显化，其中“译”是主导，“作”是一种显性倾向。类比他译，自译在翻译结果上仍体现为以忠实于原作为主导。
침대자역시불시번역저일문제，본문수선진행자역개안대비분석，즉이장애령단편소설《계화증아소비추》위례，대해한어원작급기자역문본화타역문본진행어제대비，병기우COCA어료고분별대해자역문본、타역문본이급자역자동시대영국녀작가적영문원창문본진행어내류비，연후재기우한영자역평행어료고급기단어가비어료고대자역영어、문학타역영어화문학원창영어가이어내고찰，종중규탐자역특성。문장지출：자역기본향유타역범주적공동특성，단재“역자주체성”상비타역경현장양；타역과정중“역”여“작”호동왕왕교위은성，기중“역”시주재，“작”위고유잠재；자역중“역”여“작”호동왕왕경직접현화，기중“역”시주도，“작”시일충현성경향。류비타역，자역재번역결과상잉체현위이충실우원작위주도。
Given the different views on whether self-translation is really translation, this paper attempts to make clear the nature of self-translation by first taking Eileen Chang＇ s short story Guihuazheng, A-Xiao Beiqiu as a case study, making a eontrastive analysis between the Chinese original and its two English versions -- Shame, Amah translated by the author and Steamed Osmanthus Flower ： Ah Xiao＇ s Unhappy Autumn by Simon Patton -- and drawing a detailed intralingual compari- son between the above-mentioned two English versions and the short story To Room Nineteen by British woman novelist Dor- is Lessing on the basis of COCA. Then,it proceeds with the intralingual comparison between the English self-translations based on Chinese English Self-Translation Parallel Corpus（ CESTPC）, the conventionally-translated English texts based on TEC Narrative Prose and the English original texts based on BNC Narrative Prose. The paper holds that self-translation basi- cally possesses those features that conventional translation usually does except that the self-translator＇ s subjectivity is sup- posed to be much greater than the conventional translator＇s, that in conventional translation, ＂translating＂ and ＂writing＂ interact fairly covertly, among which ＂translating＂ dominates while ＂writing＂ usually happens as it is, and that in self- translation, ＂translating＂ and ＂writing＂ interplay more overtly, among which ＂translating＂ is the primary mission while ＂writing＂ intervenes more intentionally. But compared with conventionally-translated texts, self-translations are also faithful to their original texts and remain unchanged qualitatively as translated texts.