南开管理评论
南開管理評論
남개관리평론
Nankai Business Review
2015年
2期
51~63
,共null页
跨区域市场进入战略 市场进入模式 所有制性质 制度环境 房地产行业
跨區域市場進入戰略 市場進入模式 所有製性質 製度環境 房地產行業
과구역시장진입전략 시장진입모식 소유제성질 제도배경 방지산행업
Cross-Regional Market Entry Strategy; Market Entry Mode; Ownership; Institutional Environment; Real Estate Industry
转轨经济中企业所有制性质与外部制度环境差异对企业战略选择有着至关重要的作用,本文结合资源依赖理论和制度理论,探讨不同所有制性质的房地产企业在跨区域发展战略和市场进入模式选择上的差异,并进一步考察区域制度环境对这种差异的影响作用。研究表明,民营房地产企业发生跨区域经营的概率显著高于国有房地产企业;国有房地产企业倾向于选择对目标市场经营活动较高控制程度的跨区域市场进入模式,而民营房地产企业则倾向于选择对目标市场经营活动较低控制程度的跨区域市场进入模式;当房地产企业进入制度相对完善的区域时,尽管民营企业相比国有企业仍然更倾向于选择低控制市场进入模式,但是两类所有制企业的市场进入模式选择差异显著缩小。
轉軌經濟中企業所有製性質與外部製度環境差異對企業戰略選擇有著至關重要的作用,本文結閤資源依賴理論和製度理論,探討不同所有製性質的房地產企業在跨區域髮展戰略和市場進入模式選擇上的差異,併進一步攷察區域製度環境對這種差異的影響作用。研究錶明,民營房地產企業髮生跨區域經營的概率顯著高于國有房地產企業;國有房地產企業傾嚮于選擇對目標市場經營活動較高控製程度的跨區域市場進入模式,而民營房地產企業則傾嚮于選擇對目標市場經營活動較低控製程度的跨區域市場進入模式;噹房地產企業進入製度相對完善的區域時,儘管民營企業相比國有企業仍然更傾嚮于選擇低控製市場進入模式,但是兩類所有製企業的市場進入模式選擇差異顯著縮小。
전궤경제중기업소유제성질여외부제도배경차이대기업전략선택유착지관중요적작용,본문결합자원의뢰이론화제도이론,탐토불동소유제성질적방지산기업재과구역발전전략화시장진입모식선택상적차이,병진일보고찰구역제도배경대저충차이적영향작용。연구표명,민영방지산기업발생과구역경영적개솔현저고우국유방지산기업;국유방지산기업경향우선택대목표시장경영활동교고공제정도적과구역시장진입모식,이민영방지산기업칙경향우선택대목표시장경영활동교저공제정도적과구역시장진입모식;당방지산기업진입제도상대완선적구역시,진관민영기업상비국유기업잉연경경향우선택저공제시장진입모식,단시량류소유제기업적시장진입모식선택차이현저축소。
In transitional economies, firms' strategic decisions are substantially inf luenced by the ownership status and the external institutional environment. Built upon resource dependence theory and institutional theory, this article investigates into the issue of how ownership status and sub-national institutions affect firms' decisions on market entry strategies and the choice of cross-regional market entry modes. The empirical findings based on the data of real estate industry in China suggest that privately-owned enterprises are more likely than state-owned enterprises to choose cross-regional market entry strategies and low-control market entry modes, but the difference is less evident in regions with relatively high market orientation. This paper complements the existing theories by showing that ownership status affects the preference towards cross-regional expansion and towards different levels of control over operation in host markets. Firms with different ownership status have different resource endowments and constraints. State-owned enterprises have tighter relationship with local governments in home markets and easier access to favorable financing, thus weaker motivation to pursue cross-regional expansions than that of privately-owned enter prises. In contrast, privately-owned enterprises have to overcome the disadvantage by cross-regional expansion and low-control cooperation with the parties in host markets.We also present fresh evidence on the interaction between ownership status and institutional factors in affecting the choice of cross-regional market entry modes. Institutional environment could change the constraints under which an enterprise makes a decision. When entering a less developed market environment, since the gap of resource endowment between privately-owned enterprises and state-owned enterprises in the host market becomes more substantial, privately-owned enterprises may rely more on external resources at the expense of operation control to alleviate uncertainties and government discretions. To the contrary, when entering a more developed market environment, privately-owned enterprises are more able to increase their control on operation, although they are still at a disadvantageous position against that of state-owned enterprises. The phenomena observed in the study call for constant improvement of institutional environment to facilitate privately-owned enterprises to alleviate resource constraints when competing with state-owned enterprises.