CAJ | 학술논문

在＂中西理（论）实（践）＂交叉的十字路口,中国管理学者面临着路线选择的挑战。从理论发展的目的出发,在明确理论的内涵和管理理论的衡量标准,梳理西方管理研究的多元范式、不同方法论特点及理论生产类型之后,以波特等西方著名学者的实践为例,对管理学者的差异定位进行了说明。研究认为,中国的管理学者应该根据自身的特点,批判性吸收西方管理学研究的多元范式和方法论,从有利于开展自己感兴趣的研究问题出发,确定学者个人的主导研究范式和理论类型定位;有志于管理理论发展的本土学者,应在研究范式和方法论提升的基础上,发展有世界水平的＂中国学问＂;中国管理学术共同体的健康发展依赖于不同学者的合理定位和学术共同体内部的多样化发展。
재＂중서리（론）실（천）＂교차적십자로구,중국관이학자면림착로선선택적도전。종이론발전적목적출발,재명학이론적내함화관리이론적형량표준,소리서방관리연구적다원범식、불동방법론특점급이론생산류형지후,이파특등서방저명학자적실천위례,대관이학자적차이정위진행료설명。연구인위,중국적관이학자응해근거자신적특점,비판성흡수서방관이학연구적다원범식화방법론,종유리우개전자기감흥취적연구문제출발,학정학자개인적주도연구범식화이론류형정위;유지우관리이론발전적본토학자,응재연구범식화방법론제승적기출상,발전유세계수평적＂중국학문＂;중국관이학술공동체적건강발전의뢰우불동학자적합리정위화학술공동체내부적다양화발전。
At the crossroad of East/West and theory/practice debate,Chinese management scholars are facing great challenges on choosing proper research roadmap.From a theory building perspective,this article defines what theory is and the features of good management theory,then examines the different research paradigms and knowledge producing modes in US and European management society,and it also illustrates the different positions of a few famous management scholars in the US.Furthermore,a multiparadigm approach is proposed to management study for Chinese scholars,suggesting them to choose a main paradigm suited for themselves based on their research interests and personal characteristics.Those Chinese scholars who may wish for building good theories could construct their own＂Chinese scholarship＂with world-class quality based on choosing proper research paradigms and methodology.It is argued that a healthy Chinese management scholarship needs different positioning of various scholars and advocates diversity in the scholarship community.Finally,the article appeals for the efforts of scholars,academic journals and institutions in the Chinese scholarship community.