CAJ | 학술논문

历史探究取向在美国课程领域的兴盛来自于学者们对这一领域的洞察：倾向于对实践问题的即刻解答,追逐高度的实用性,偏好应急之举和权宜之计,并燃烧着以新代旧的激情。课程理论者和实践者需要通过与专业前辈的历史对话,来避免课程研究及变革的孤立性,熟谙课程的传统,从而摆脱某些不合需要的方面或某些无形的不利影响。对话以文献法、口述史、传记研究、内容分析法等路径展开,议题广泛,涉及课程作为一个工作和研究领域的成长、学校科目的演变、课程组织与机构、核心课程人物、课程论争的发展历程等。有待努力的方向是：对话的路径需加强个案研究;对话的旨趣需凸显了解、质疑、批判与理解,而不是寻求解方;对话主体应集课程学者与教育史学者两家之长。
역사탐구취향재미국과정영역적흥성래자우학자문대저일영역적동찰：경향우대실천문제적즉각해답,추축고도적실용성,편호응급지거화권의지계,병연소착이신대구적격정。과정이론자화실천자수요통과여전업전배적역사대화,래피면과정연구급변혁적고립성,숙암과정적전통,종이파탈모사불합수요적방면혹모사무형적불리영향。대화이문헌법、구술사、전기연구、내용분석법등로경전개,의제엄범,섭급과정작위일개공작화연구영역적성장、학교과목적연변、과정조직여궤구、핵심과정인물、과정논쟁적발전역정등。유대노력적방향시：대화적로경수가강개안연구;대화적지취수철현료해、질의、비판여리해,이불시심구해방;대화주체응집과정학자여교육사학자량가지장。
The thriving of historical approach in the curriculum field of America can be attributed to the scholars’insight in this field;that is,curriculum studies tend to look for handy solutions to practical problems,seek high practicability,prefer to emergency measures and expedients,and have a passion for the replacement of the old by the new.Curriculum theorists and practitioners need to engage in dialogue with their professional forebears to avoid the isolation of curriculum studies and reforms,to be familiar with the traditions of curriculum so as to rid of some undesirable aspects or the unseen influence.The paths of dialogue have included literature method,oral history,biographical research,content analysis and so on.The dialogue has covered a wide range of issues such as the growth of curriculum as a field of work and study,the evolution of school subjects,the development of curriculum organizations and institutions as well as central figures and professional debates.For the further efforts,firstly,as the paths of dialogue,case study needs to be strengthened;secondly,its objective should be to know,question,criticize and understand rather than to seek handy solutions to problems;finally,the main interlocutors should learn from both curriculum scholars and educational historians.