工业工程
工業工程
공업공정
Industrial Engineering Journal
2015年
2期
20~27
,共null页
汽柴油需求 预测 主成分分析 支持向量机
汽柴油需求 預測 主成分分析 支持嚮量機
기시유수구 예측 주성분분석 지지향량궤
gasoline and diesel demand;prediction;principal component analysis;support vector machines
综合分析了影响汽柴油消费需求的关键因素,并针对其具有自相关性、复杂性、数据量大等特点,采用主成分分析法对样本数据进行降维处理,形成新的样本集。对支持向量机预测模型进行改进,在其基础之上引入时序动态因子,将上年的汽柴油需求历史数据作为时序反馈因子引入模型,从而形成新的动态反馈拟合模型,建立相应的需求预测模型。对1996~2012年的汽柴油需求预测进行实例研究,并将本文中所提方法的预测结果与灰色GM(1,1)模型、BP神经网络模型进行对比分析。结果表明本文中的主成分分析与改进支持向量机预测方法相对于GM(1,1)模型其预测误差均值分别降低了72.7%和74.86%,相对于BP神经网络其预测误差均值分别降低了81.3%和81.66%,从而证明了此方法的有效性和优越性。
綜閤分析瞭影響汽柴油消費需求的關鍵因素,併針對其具有自相關性、複雜性、數據量大等特點,採用主成分分析法對樣本數據進行降維處理,形成新的樣本集。對支持嚮量機預測模型進行改進,在其基礎之上引入時序動態因子,將上年的汽柴油需求歷史數據作為時序反饋因子引入模型,從而形成新的動態反饋擬閤模型,建立相應的需求預測模型。對1996~2012年的汽柴油需求預測進行實例研究,併將本文中所提方法的預測結果與灰色GM(1,1)模型、BP神經網絡模型進行對比分析。結果錶明本文中的主成分分析與改進支持嚮量機預測方法相對于GM(1,1)模型其預測誤差均值分彆降低瞭72.7%和74.86%,相對于BP神經網絡其預測誤差均值分彆降低瞭81.3%和81.66%,從而證明瞭此方法的有效性和優越性。
종합분석료영향기시유소비수구적관건인소,병침대기구유자상관성、복잡성、수거량대등특점,채용주성분분석법대양본수거진행강유처리,형성신적양본집。대지지향량궤예측모형진행개진,재기기출지상인입시서동태인자,장상년적기시유수구역사수거작위시서반궤인자인입모형,종이형성신적동태반궤의합모형,건립상응적수구예측모형。대1996~2012년적기시유수구예측진행실례연구,병장본문중소제방법적예측결과여회색GM(1,1)모형、BP신경망락모형진행대비분석。결과표명본문중적주성분분석여개진지지향량궤예측방법상대우GM(1,1)모형기예측오차균치분별강저료72.7%화74.86%,상대우BP신경망락기예측오차균치분별강저료81.3%화81.66%,종이증명료차방법적유효성화우월성。
Firstly, a comprehensive analysis of the key factors affecting consumer demand for gasoline and diesel is made for self-relevance, complexity and data volume, etc. A principal component analysis is made to reduce the dimension of the sample data, and a new set of samples is formed. Then, by improving the support vector machine model and introducing a dynamic factor in the timing of its foundation, and the demand for gasoline and diesel last year historical data into the model as the timing of the feedback factor, thus forming a new dynamic feedback fitting model, an appropriate demand forecasting model is estab- lished. Finally, a case study is made on forecasting demand for gasoline and diesel in the 1996 -2012, and the proposed method of predicting and gray GM ( 1,1 ) model, and BP neural network model are ana- lyzed. The results show that the improved prediction method relative to the GM support vector machine principal component analysis ( 1,1 ) model of the prediction errors are respectively 72.7% , 74.86% low- er, and that comparing with the BP neural network, the prediction errors are reduced on average by 81. 3% ,81.66%. Results show that the principal component analysis using improved support vector machine method is superior to existing methods, which proves the effectiveness and superiority of this method.