江汉学术
江漢學術
강한학술
Journal of Wuhan Institute of Education
2015年
3期
55~61
,共null页
政府 市场 资源配置 政府经济行为 后发国家
政府 市場 資源配置 政府經濟行為 後髮國傢
정부 시장 자원배치 정부경제행위 후발국가
government ; market ; resource allocation ; government' s economic behavior ; latecomer countries
政府与市场是可作用于资源配置的两种方式。纵观世界经济的发展史,英、美、德、日等发达国家是成功实现由传统农业经济向现代工业经济转型的国家,政府和市场对资源的配置作用强度呈有规律的交替演进。在现代化进程初期,政府对资源配置发挥着主导作用,随着市场机制的健全,政府的资源配置作用逐渐减弱,市场对资源的配置作用则正好相反。“东亚模式”的成功和“拉美模式”的失败,并不在于东亚没有干预,而是在于东亚经济体政府干预比拉美政府干预更加有效。跨越五百年的经济史表明,发达国家倡导的市场自由化而形成的产业分工只能使后发国家更加依附于发达国家,囿于产业价值链的底端。后发国家赶超发达国家的秘诀是政府积极作为,抓住机遇直接切入具有报酬递增的高质量经济活动,是后发国家实现超赶的捷径。
政府與市場是可作用于資源配置的兩種方式。縱觀世界經濟的髮展史,英、美、德、日等髮達國傢是成功實現由傳統農業經濟嚮現代工業經濟轉型的國傢,政府和市場對資源的配置作用彊度呈有規律的交替縯進。在現代化進程初期,政府對資源配置髮揮著主導作用,隨著市場機製的健全,政府的資源配置作用逐漸減弱,市場對資源的配置作用則正好相反。“東亞模式”的成功和“拉美模式”的失敗,併不在于東亞沒有榦預,而是在于東亞經濟體政府榦預比拉美政府榦預更加有效。跨越五百年的經濟史錶明,髮達國傢倡導的市場自由化而形成的產業分工隻能使後髮國傢更加依附于髮達國傢,囿于產業價值鏈的底耑。後髮國傢趕超髮達國傢的祕訣是政府積極作為,抓住機遇直接切入具有報酬遞增的高質量經濟活動,是後髮國傢實現超趕的捷徑。
정부여시장시가작용우자원배치적량충방식。종관세계경제적발전사,영、미、덕、일등발체국가시성공실현유전통농업경제향현대공업경제전형적국가,정부화시장대자원적배치작용강도정유규률적교체연진。재현대화진정초기,정부대자원배치발휘착주도작용,수착시장궤제적건전,정부적자원배치작용축점감약,시장대자원적배치작용칙정호상반。“동아모식”적성공화“랍미모식”적실패,병불재우동아몰유간예,이시재우동아경제체정부간예비랍미정부간예경가유효。과월오백년적경제사표명,발체국가창도적시장자유화이형성적산업분공지능사후발국가경가의부우발체국가,유우산업개치련적저단。후발국가간초발체국가적비결시정부적겁작위,조주궤우직접절입구유보수체증적고질량경제활동,시후발국가실현초간적첩경。
Government and market are the two kinds of resource allocation. In the history of world economic development, the resource allocation leading roles of government and market are regular alternating in the developed countries, such as England, America, German and Japan, which have successfully transited from traditional agricultural economy to modern industrial economy. In early modernization, government plays the leading role of resource allocation. With the market mechanism increasingly stronger, the role of government is weakening while the role of market is just the opposite. The success of "East Asian model" and failure of "Latin American model" not depend on the lack of governmentintervention in East Asian economies, but on the more effective intervention than in the Latin America. Economic history spanning five hundred years shows that the industrial division caused by market liberalization that advocated by developed countries may make developing countries more attached to the developed countries, which keeps the developing countries in the bottom of value chain of industry. The secret of the latecomer countries to surpass the advanced developed countries is that an active government. To directly engage in high quality economic activities with increasing returns, it is the shortcut of latecomer countries to surpass the advanced developed countries.