CAJ | 학술논문

旨在考察不同年龄的个体,在不同回忆序列和学习材料上协作促进的发展情况。采用3（回忆序列：协作—个人—个人〔CII〕、个人—协作—个人〔ICI〕、个人—个人—个人〔III〕）×5（年龄：9、11、14、17、20）×2（材料：图片、文字）的被试间设计。结果发现：（1）各年龄个体在CII和ICI两种回忆序列上均出现了协作促进,且两种序列条件下被试的最终个人回忆成绩无差异;（2）另外,17岁个体的协作促进量显著高于9岁、11岁、14岁和20岁,其他各年龄之间无差异;（3）图片和文字的协作促进量无差异。这说明小组协作回忆的顺序对协作促进没有太大影响,17岁个体协作促进的效果最好。
지재고찰불동년령적개체,재불동회억서렬화학습재료상협작촉진적발전정황。채용3（회억서렬：협작—개인—개인〔CII〕、개인—협작—개인〔ICI〕、개인—개인—개인〔III〕）×5（년령：9、11、14、17、20）×2（재료：도편、문자）적피시간설계。결과발현：（1）각년령개체재CII화ICI량충회억서렬상균출현료협작촉진,차량충서렬조건하피시적최종개인회억성적무차이;（2）령외,17세개체적협작촉진량현저고우9세、11세、14세화20세,기타각년령지간무차이;（3）도편화문자적협작촉진량무차이。저설명소조협작회억적순서대협작촉진몰유태대영향,17세개체협작촉진적효과최호。
This research explored the development of individuals＇ collaborative facilitation of different ages in different retrieve sequences and learning materials. The design was a 5 （age： 9 years old, 11 years old, 14 years old, 17 years old and 20 years old） × 3 （recall sequence： CII. ICI,III） × 2 （learning materials： pictures or texts） between-subjects design. The results showed that collaborative facilitation appeared in all ages of both CII andlCl recall sequences, and the final memory performance in these two sequences had no difference. What＇s more, the amount of collaborative facilitation of 17 years old participants was higher than 9, 11, 14 and 20 years old. There was no difference among other age. No matter how old the participant was, there was no difference between picture and texts on the collaborative facilitation amount. These suggest that the order of collaborative memory has little impact on collaborative facilitation. The effects of collaborative facilitation in 17-year-old individuals are the best.