CAJ | 학술논문

为探索潜在剖面分析（latent profile analysis,LPA）在心理行为问题识别上的应用,对12718名大学生进行心理普查,并对644名学生由心理咨询师、辅导员和兼职班主任对其心理状况进行评定,采用评定结果和阳性症状检出率作为＂黄金标准＂分析了诊断的敏感度与特异度。结果发现：（1）潜在剖面分析发现本研究大学生样本的心理行为问题可划分为三个亚群体：风险组、困扰组和健康组,分别占比9.86%、19.15%和70.99%;（2）风险组表现为突出的精神症状（Z≥2.6SD）,有61.21%的被试出现阳性症状,远高于困扰组的38.28%和健康组的8.36%;此外,困扰组以认知与情绪症状为主;（3）潜在剖面分析方法比传统划界分数方法在敏感度上能提高8.93%~35.26%,更为科学有效。
위탐색잠재부면분석（latent profile analysis,LPA）재심리행위문제식별상적응용,대12718명대학생진행심리보사,병대644명학생유심리자순사、보도원화겸직반주임대기심리상황진행평정,채용평정결과화양성증상검출솔작위＂황금표준＂분석료진단적민감도여특이도。결과발현：（1）잠재부면분석발현본연구대학생양본적심리행위문제가화분위삼개아군체：풍험조、곤우조화건강조,분별점비9.86%、19.15%화70.99%;（2）풍험조표현위돌출적정신증상（Z≥2.6SD）,유61.21%적피시출현양성증상,원고우곤우조적38.28%화건강조적8.36%;차외,곤우조이인지여정서증상위주;（3）잠재부면분석방법비전통화계분수방법재민감도상능제고8.93%~35.26%,경위과학유효。
To explore the applicability of latent profile analysis （LPA） in detecting psychological or behavioral problems, a total of 12718 college students were tested for psychological health. The psychological status of the 644 students was evaluated by psychologists, counselors and class supervisors. Using evaluation results and the 90 Symptom checklist （SCL90） positive detection rate as the ＂golden standard＂ for diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were compared between LPA and the traditional demarcation method. The results showed that：（1） Student＇s psychological and behavioral problems can be divided into three sub-groups： high risk group （9.86%） , mental confusion group （19. 15% ） and healthy group （70.99%）. （2） High risk groups were characterized by prominent mental symptoms （Z 1〉 2.6SD）. The positive symptom of mental health risk in high risk group is 61.21% , which is far above that of mental confusion group （38.28%） and mental health group （8.36%）. （3） LPA improved sensitivity by 8.93% -35.26% and showed better diagnostic accuracy comparing with the traditional demarcation method.