政法论坛:中国政法大学学报
政法論罈:中國政法大學學報
정법론단:중국정법대학학보
Tribune of Political Science and Law(Journal of China University of Political Science and Law)
2015年
3期
155~163
,共null页
零判决 法官 制度利用者 制度运营者
零判決 法官 製度利用者 製度運營者
령판결 법관 제도이용자 제도운영자
Zero Judgment; Judge; Legal Regime Operator; Legal Regime Utilizer
零判决是大调解机制和调解优先政策引发的高调解率的极致表现。法院往往将这种现象与长存于中国传统司法文化中的无讼理念密切联系起来,并大加倡扬。经过人为修饰和加工的零判决现象实际上与无讼理念不具有必然的逻辑关联,无讼理念不能作为零判决的正当基础,更找不到证成零判决的其他法律理论,反过来,零判决也未必能达到无讼理念所要求的彻底解决纠纷。零判决更因其诉讼虚无主义、法治理念虚化和解纷方式错位等不当倾向,不应作为司法实践追求的目标。在反思零判决和高调解率时,应当注重制度运营者和制度利用者的视角融合。
零判決是大調解機製和調解優先政策引髮的高調解率的極緻錶現。法院往往將這種現象與長存于中國傳統司法文化中的無訟理唸密切聯繫起來,併大加倡颺。經過人為脩飾和加工的零判決現象實際上與無訟理唸不具有必然的邏輯關聯,無訟理唸不能作為零判決的正噹基礎,更找不到證成零判決的其他法律理論,反過來,零判決也未必能達到無訟理唸所要求的徹底解決糾紛。零判決更因其訴訟虛無主義、法治理唸虛化和解紛方式錯位等不噹傾嚮,不應作為司法實踐追求的目標。在反思零判決和高調解率時,應噹註重製度運營者和製度利用者的視角融閤。
령판결시대조해궤제화조해우선정책인발적고조해솔적겁치표현。법원왕왕장저충현상여장존우중국전통사법문화중적무송이념밀절련계기래,병대가창양。경과인위수식화가공적령판결현상실제상여무송이념불구유필연적라집관련,무송이념불능작위령판결적정당기출,경조불도증성령판결적기타법률이론,반과래,령판결야미필능체도무송이념소요구적철저해결규분。령판결경인기소송허무주의、법치이념허화화해분방식착위등불당경향,불응작위사법실천추구적목표。재반사령판결화고조해솔시,응당주중제도운영자화제도이용자적시각융합。
"Zero judgment" is the extreme performance of the high mediation rate triggered by the policy of priority to the mediation under multipartite mediation mechanism, which is al- ways advocated by the court because of the "no lawsuit idea" rooted in Chinese traditional cul- ture. However,there is no logical inevitability in the relationship between "zero judgment" and "no lawsuit idea". Therefore, "no lawsuit idea" shouldn' t be used to justify" zero judgment". Beyond that, any rationality basis for "zero judgment" can't be found. On the contrary ,the evi- dence addresses that "zero judgment" seems to be difficult to solve the dispute thoroughly which is desired by "no lawsuit idea". In addition," zero judgment" is always accompanied with legal procedure nihilism, nominal law - governed society, misplacement of the court' s role and so on. In order to solve these problems," zero judgment" should be ruled out from the goals of judicial practices. The rethinking of "zero judgment" and high mediation rate performance requirements that currently exist should base on the fusion of legal regime operators, view and legal regime utilizers ' perspective.