政法论坛:中国政法大学学报
政法論罈:中國政法大學學報
정법론단:중국정법대학학보
Tribune of Political Science and Law(Journal of China University of Political Science and Law)
2015年
3期
183~191
,共null页
通谋 虚伪结婚 法律效力
通謀 虛偽結婚 法律效力
통모 허위결혼 법률효력
Colluded Mendacious Wedding ; Legal Effection
俗称的假结婚、虚假结婚在法律概念上宜认定为是通谋的虚伪结婚,它是指男女双方缔结婚姻时约定不建立婚姻共同生活的情形,特点是意思与表示不一致,属于意思表示存在瑕疵的情形。对其法律效力,各国大致存在着无效与可撤销两种立法例,是否援用民法关于通谋虚伪行为的一般规定也存在不同。此外,有的国家法律还允许虚假结婚行为的效力在法定情形下从无效、可撤销转为有效。对通谋的虚伪结婚,不能简单地援用民法总则的一般规则一律将其效力归为无效,而应当在原则上将其规定为可撤销,特殊情况下为有效。法律不能完全漠视已存在的婚姻事实和已经形成的家庭关系,在已经存在夫妻共同生活或者双方生育有子女的情形下,法律应当认可通谋的虚伪结婚有效,不允许撤销或无效。至于第三人利益的保护问题,笔者主张原则上采用表示主义,以意思主义作为补充。此外,对于通谋虚伪结婚在其他法域的效力,也需要注意保持不同法域之间在逻辑上的一致。
俗稱的假結婚、虛假結婚在法律概唸上宜認定為是通謀的虛偽結婚,它是指男女雙方締結婚姻時約定不建立婚姻共同生活的情形,特點是意思與錶示不一緻,屬于意思錶示存在瑕疵的情形。對其法律效力,各國大緻存在著無效與可撤銷兩種立法例,是否援用民法關于通謀虛偽行為的一般規定也存在不同。此外,有的國傢法律還允許虛假結婚行為的效力在法定情形下從無效、可撤銷轉為有效。對通謀的虛偽結婚,不能簡單地援用民法總則的一般規則一律將其效力歸為無效,而應噹在原則上將其規定為可撤銷,特殊情況下為有效。法律不能完全漠視已存在的婚姻事實和已經形成的傢庭關繫,在已經存在伕妻共同生活或者雙方生育有子女的情形下,法律應噹認可通謀的虛偽結婚有效,不允許撤銷或無效。至于第三人利益的保護問題,筆者主張原則上採用錶示主義,以意思主義作為補充。此外,對于通謀虛偽結婚在其他法域的效力,也需要註意保持不同法域之間在邏輯上的一緻。
속칭적가결혼、허가결혼재법률개념상의인정위시통모적허위결혼,타시지남녀쌍방체결혼인시약정불건립혼인공동생활적정형,특점시의사여표시불일치,속우의사표시존재하자적정형。대기법률효력,각국대치존재착무효여가철소량충입법례,시부원용민법관우통모허위행위적일반규정야존재불동。차외,유적국가법률환윤허허가결혼행위적효력재법정정형하종무효、가철소전위유효。대통모적허위결혼,불능간단지원용민법총칙적일반규칙일률장기효력귀위무효,이응당재원칙상장기규정위가철소,특수정황하위유효。법률불능완전막시이존재적혼인사실화이경형성적가정관계,재이경존재부처공동생활혹자쌍방생육유자녀적정형하,법률응당인가통모적허위결혼유효,불윤허철소혹무효。지우제삼인이익적보호문제,필자주장원칙상채용표시주의,이의사주의작위보충。차외,대우통모허위결혼재기타법역적효력,야수요주의보지불동법역지간재라집상적일치。
The proper legal term for what is commonly known as false marriage is the colluded mendacious wedding, which means that a man and a woman get married with agreement of not living a marital life In the situation of oneg intention disagreeing with his words, it is one kind of defection of declaration. legal validity, there are two types of legislation generally in different countries: void and voidable. It er. On its is also different on whether to apply the general provisions of Civil law about pretended legal act. In addition, it is al- lowed to change the legal effect of mendacious wedding from void or voidable to valid in some countries when certain legal circumstances are satisfied. The colluded mendacious wedding should not be void simply accord- ing to the general provisions of Civil law, instead cial circumstances. The law should not disregard couple actually has lived , it should be voidable as an principle and valid under spethe fact that marriage and family has been existed. When a er or has given birth to children, the colluded mendacious wedding should be provided as valid ,which cant be revoked or void. In regard to the protection of the third party' s interests, it is the author' s contention that declaration theory should be applied in principle and will theory as supplementa- ry. In addition, we should pay attention to keep it logically consistent with different legal fields the on the legal effect of the colluded mendacious wedding.