CAJ | 학술논문

民法法典化的主要意义有二：一是构造逻辑严密而不出现任何冲突的法典从而实现法典适用的＂自动化＂,进而实现立法权统一于国家立法机关的目的;二是更好地维护、实现民事主体的合法权益。而无疑后者才是民法法典化最终的价值所在。但能动司法的客观存在,使这两者都似乎难以成立。从传统的法治理念来看,法典化与能动司法似乎无法共存。但若深入分析,尤其是就我国的法治实情而言,若要体现更好地维护、实现民事主体的合法权益的宗旨,实现社会的法治化,民法法典化与能动司法两者缺一不可。
민법법전화적주요의의유이：일시구조라집엄밀이불출현임하충돌적법전종이실현법전괄용적＂자동화＂,진이실현입법권통일우국가입법궤관적목적;이시경호지유호、실현민사주체적합법권익。이무의후자재시민법법전화최종적개치소재。단능동사법적객관존재,사저량자도사호난이성립。종전통적법치이념래간,법전화여능동사법사호무법공존。단약심입분석,우기시취아국적법치실정이언,약요체현경호지유호、실현민사주체적합법권익적종지,실현사회적법치화,민법법전화여능동사법량자결일불가。
The main significance of codification of civil law there are two： one is the structural logic without any conflict of law so as to realize the code for “automatic”, so as to realize the legislative power in state legislatures; one is to better safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the civil subject. And the latter is the final value of the codification of civil law. But the objective existence of judicial activism, makes both of these seems so difficult to set up. From the perspective of the traditional concept of the rule of law, law and judicial activism seems unable to co-exist, but if further analysis, especially on the rule of law in China ’s situation, To achieve better maintenance, realization of the legitimate rights and interests of the purpose of the civil subject, the rule of law society, the Civil Code and the judicial activism both are indispensable.