教育与经济
教育與經濟
교육여경제
Education & Economy
2015年
2期
44~50
,共null页
大学筹资结构 大学治理 办学绩效
大學籌資結構 大學治理 辦學績效
대학주자결구 대학치리 판학적효
university funding sources;university governance;performance
本文以美国全国性大学为样本,对大学筹资结构与办学绩效的关系进行了实证分析。结果表明,大学经费来源结构对大学办学绩效不构成显著影响,竞争性经费结构对大学办学绩效则构成显著影响。具体到各项经费上,政府拨款比例对大学办学绩效构成显著负向影响,政府补助与合同、个人捐赠与合同比例、投资收益比例、其他核心收益比例均对大学办学绩效构成显著正向影响,学费比例不构成显著影响。我国应该鼓励大学筹资结构多元化和民办大学的发展,促进大学基金会和社会捐赠制度建设,培育和挖掘企业或校友资源,增强政府经费的竞争性和选择性,从而促进大学为赢得更多经费支持而不断完善内部的治理结构,提高自身办学绩效。
本文以美國全國性大學為樣本,對大學籌資結構與辦學績效的關繫進行瞭實證分析。結果錶明,大學經費來源結構對大學辦學績效不構成顯著影響,競爭性經費結構對大學辦學績效則構成顯著影響。具體到各項經費上,政府撥款比例對大學辦學績效構成顯著負嚮影響,政府補助與閤同、箇人捐贈與閤同比例、投資收益比例、其他覈心收益比例均對大學辦學績效構成顯著正嚮影響,學費比例不構成顯著影響。我國應該鼓勵大學籌資結構多元化和民辦大學的髮展,促進大學基金會和社會捐贈製度建設,培育和挖掘企業或校友資源,增彊政府經費的競爭性和選擇性,從而促進大學為贏得更多經費支持而不斷完善內部的治理結構,提高自身辦學績效。
본문이미국전국성대학위양본,대대학주자결구여판학적효적관계진행료실증분석。결과표명,대학경비래원결구대대학판학적효불구성현저영향,경쟁성경비결구대대학판학적효칙구성현저영향。구체도각항경비상,정부발관비례대대학판학적효구성현저부향영향,정부보조여합동、개인연증여합동비례、투자수익비례、기타핵심수익비례균대대학판학적효구성현저정향영향,학비비례불구성현저영향。아국응해고려대학주자결구다원화화민판대학적발전,촉진대학기금회화사회연증제도건설,배육화알굴기업혹교우자원,증강정부경비적경쟁성화선택성,종이촉진대학위영득경다경비지지이불단완선내부적치리결구,제고자신판학적효。
This paper makes a systemic analysis of the relationship between the Universities’funding sources and performance based on the data of American national universities. The results are as follows: the university funding sources structure including government funds proportion and non-government funds proportion doesn’t have a significant effect on the performances of the universities, but the competitive funds structure has a significant effect. Specifically, the proportion of government appropriations has a significant negative effect on the performance of universities, the proportion of government grants and contracts, private gifts, grants and contracts, investment return and other core revenues all have significant positive effects, and the proportion of tuition fees does not has a significant effect. We should encourage the diversification of universities funding sources and the development of private universities in our country, promote the construction of the university foundation and social donation system, nurture and develop enterprise or alumni resources, and enhance the competition and selection of government funds, so as to stimulate the universities to improve their governance and performance for winning more financial support.