华侨大学学报:哲学社会科学版
華僑大學學報:哲學社會科學版
화교대학학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Huaqiao University(Humanities & Social Science)
2015年
2期
25~30
,共null页
劳动 劳动价值论 价值 垄断 抽象劳动
勞動 勞動價值論 價值 壟斷 抽象勞動
노동 노동개치론 개치 롱단 추상노동
labor; labor theory of value; value; monopolization; abstract ;labor
马克思的劳动价值论把作为一种整体性的作用系统之“劳动”还原为脱离生产资料的单纯的劳动力的使用,他实质上不是把“劳动”而是把单纯的劳动力的使用作为创造商品价值的唯一源泉,因此他所谓的劳动价值论其实不过是“劳力价值论”。真正的“劳动价值论”就是以劳动力和生产资料作为创造商品价值的共同源泉的生产要素价值论。这无论在公有制还是私有制社会都是真理。马克思所谓的“抽象劳动”,其实就是对所有种类的具体劳动之共性的概括,因而也就是指作为共名的“具体劳动”。这种意义上的抽象劳动,其所创造的就是作为共名的“使用价值”,亦即作为共名的商品之使用价值,而根本就不是什么价值。剥削根源于垄断,无论是私有制还是公有制社会,只要存在利大于弊的垄断并且垄断者凭借其垄断地位取得了远远高于非垄断者的不正常利益,剥削就产生了。
馬剋思的勞動價值論把作為一種整體性的作用繫統之“勞動”還原為脫離生產資料的單純的勞動力的使用,他實質上不是把“勞動”而是把單純的勞動力的使用作為創造商品價值的唯一源泉,因此他所謂的勞動價值論其實不過是“勞力價值論”。真正的“勞動價值論”就是以勞動力和生產資料作為創造商品價值的共同源泉的生產要素價值論。這無論在公有製還是私有製社會都是真理。馬剋思所謂的“抽象勞動”,其實就是對所有種類的具體勞動之共性的概括,因而也就是指作為共名的“具體勞動”。這種意義上的抽象勞動,其所創造的就是作為共名的“使用價值”,亦即作為共名的商品之使用價值,而根本就不是什麽價值。剝削根源于壟斷,無論是私有製還是公有製社會,隻要存在利大于弊的壟斷併且壟斷者憑藉其壟斷地位取得瞭遠遠高于非壟斷者的不正常利益,剝削就產生瞭。
마극사적노동개치론파작위일충정체성적작용계통지“노동”환원위탈리생산자료적단순적노동력적사용,타실질상불시파“노동”이시파단순적노동력적사용작위창조상품개치적유일원천,인차타소위적노동개치론기실불과시“로력개치론”。진정적“노동개치론”취시이노동력화생산자료작위창조상품개치적공동원천적생산요소개치론。저무론재공유제환시사유제사회도시진리。마극사소위적“추상노동”,기실취시대소유충류적구체노동지공성적개괄,인이야취시지작위공명적“구체노동”。저충의의상적추상노동,기소창조적취시작위공명적“사용개치”,역즉작위공명적상품지사용개치,이근본취불시십요개치。박삭근원우롱단,무론시사유제환시공유제사회,지요존재리대우폐적롱단병차롱단자빙차기롱단지위취득료원원고우비롱단자적불정상이익,박삭취산생료。
Marx's labor theory of value is, essentially, a labor forces theory of value, because he really considered the use of separate labor forces rather than labor itself as the only source of the value of commodities when he reduced labor that is in itself an integral system of function to solitary use of labor forces without means of production. A labor theory of value, which is true regardless of where it is in the society of public ownership or private ownership, is a productive factors theory of value that beth labor forces and means of production are common sources of the value of commodities. Marx's concept of abstract labor, which produces use-value as generic concept, i. e. , use-value of commodity as generic concept, rather than value, for generalizing from all species of concrete labor, is really concrete labor as generic concept. Monopolization is the root of exploitation, so, no matter where it is in public ownership or private ownership society, where there is bad monopolization which makes monopolists snatch by means of their monopolization abnormal interests which are far more than interests which non-monopolists obtain, where there is exploitation.