华侨大学学报:哲学社会科学版
華僑大學學報:哲學社會科學版
화교대학학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Huaqiao University(Humanities & Social Science)
2015年
2期
91~101
,共null页
群体性纠纷 纠纷解决 示范诉讼 德国证券纠纷
群體性糾紛 糾紛解決 示範訴訟 德國證券糾紛
군체성규분 규분해결 시범소송 덕국증권규분
group disputes ; resolving disputes ; leading case litigation; securities disputes in German
在群体性纠纷解决过程中,群意表达易被集体意旨所表征而成为公开文本,但群体成员个体表意的隐藏文本并不能有效转化为合意而被吸纳其中、并在最终影响群体司法正义的实现。既有群体司法虽通过直觉法中的情理因素涵摄以及法庭的非社会化给予响应,但也由此造成了群体性司法诉讼效率与共识达成的现代化之殇。德国针对私人投资者建立的首个示范性诉讼立法实践表明:通过示范诉讼契约吸纳当事人诉讼处分合意,可改善群体司法对每一个当事人的诉讼权保障程度;通过诉讼退出制,可协调无法达成“集体意旨”的少数当事人另行起诉;灵活运用包括胜诉酬金制在内的起诉激励,也在一定程度上纾解了群体性诉讼巨型化的困局。
在群體性糾紛解決過程中,群意錶達易被集體意旨所錶徵而成為公開文本,但群體成員箇體錶意的隱藏文本併不能有效轉化為閤意而被吸納其中、併在最終影響群體司法正義的實現。既有群體司法雖通過直覺法中的情理因素涵攝以及法庭的非社會化給予響應,但也由此造成瞭群體性司法訴訟效率與共識達成的現代化之殤。德國針對私人投資者建立的首箇示範性訴訟立法實踐錶明:通過示範訴訟契約吸納噹事人訴訟處分閤意,可改善群體司法對每一箇噹事人的訴訟權保障程度;通過訴訟退齣製,可協調無法達成“集體意旨”的少數噹事人另行起訴;靈活運用包括勝訴酬金製在內的起訴激勵,也在一定程度上紓解瞭群體性訴訟巨型化的睏跼。
재군체성규분해결과정중,군의표체역피집체의지소표정이성위공개문본,단군체성원개체표의적은장문본병불능유효전화위합의이피흡납기중、병재최종영향군체사법정의적실현。기유군체사법수통과직각법중적정리인소함섭이급법정적비사회화급여향응,단야유차조성료군체성사법소송효솔여공식체성적현대화지상。덕국침대사인투자자건립적수개시범성소송입법실천표명:통과시범소송계약흡납당사인소송처분합의,가개선군체사법대매일개당사인적소송권보장정도;통과소송퇴출제,가협조무법체성“집체의지”적소수당사인령행기소;령활운용포괄성소수금제재내적기소격려,야재일정정도상서해료군체성소송거형화적곤국。
During resolving the group disputes, the expression of a group is easy to be an open script in public as a group intention, while the individual hidden transcript of the group is not effective to be accepted by the group as a reasonable intention, which finally affects the production of the judicial justice of the group. The ready group judicatory is applied in group justice through the reasonable factors of the nature law and the informal court, which always leads to the modem defects of lawsuit efficiency of group judicatory and the trouble consensus. The leading cases litigation practice in German shows that a leading case contract helps to improve the level of litigation rights protection and the opt - out system helps minority parties who have not reach "the group intention" to bring new cases. With the function of leading case and the testing error, the leading case litigation develops both numerous standard and bottom line of public acceptance as well as litigation cost .