CAJ | 학술논문

康德将理性的自我批判比作＂法官＂组织法庭审判自身。那么理性为何能够充当＂法官＂对自身进行批判？阿伦特对＂行动者＂与＂旁观者＂及柄谷行人对＂事先＂和＂事后＂双重视角的区分,为回应此问题提供了一种可能的方式。在这种区分下,理性的自我批判所以可能,是由于康德看待理性概念的视角由＂事先＂移动到了＂事后＂,由处于＂行动者＂的视角转换为＂旁观者＂的视角。
강덕장이성적자아비판비작＂법관＂조직법정심판자신。나요이성위하능구충당＂법관＂대자신진행비판？아륜특대＂행동자＂여＂방관자＂급병곡행인대＂사선＂화＂사후＂쌍중시각적구분,위회응차문제제공료일충가능적방식。재저충구분하,이성적자아비판소이가능,시유우강덕간대이성개념적시각유＂사선＂이동도료＂사후＂,유처우＂행동자＂적시각전환위＂방관자＂적시각。
Kant compared reason＇s self-criticism to a ＂judge＂ organizes the court to try himself. But the problem is why reason can act as a ＂judge＂ to check on his own Arendt＇s twofold perspective of ＂actor＂ and ＂bystander＂ and Kojin Karatani＇s twofold perspective of ＂ex ante facto＂ and ＂ex post facto＂ provides a possible way in response to this problem. From the two- fold perspective, reason＇s self-criticism is possible because of Kant＇s perspective of reason moved from ＂ex ante facto＂ to ＂ex post facto＂ hence from ＂actor＂ to ＂bystander＂.