审计与经济研究
審計與經濟研究
심계여경제연구
Economy & Audit Study
2015年
3期
12~20
,共null页
股权激励 研发支出 风险规避效应 激励效应 股票期权 市场竞争程度 企业产权性质 公司业绩
股權激勵 研髮支齣 風險規避效應 激勵效應 股票期權 市場競爭程度 企業產權性質 公司業績
고권격려 연발지출 풍험규피효응 격려효응 고표기권 시장경쟁정도 기업산권성질 공사업적
equity incentive; R&D expenditure ; risk aversion effect ; incentive effect ; stock option ; market competitiveness ; enterprise property nature;corporate performance
股权激励被视为解决研发支出中代理冲突的重要工具,但现有经验证据并不稳定甚至相互矛盾。基于股权激励异质性的视角,本文引入新的股权激励特征——股权激励价值的股价及股价波动率敏感性,考察股权激励对企业研发支出的驱动机制,并利用2006-2012年我国实施股权激励的上市公司作为样本进行检验。研究发现:股权激励对企业研发支出的驱动机制包含风险规避效应与激励效应两个相反维度,最终驱动方向与强度取决于两类效应的博弈;限制性股票的风险规避效应显著强于股票期权;股票期权的激励效应显著强于限制性股票;市场竞争程度、企业产权性质与授予动机对限制性股票与股票期权的两类效应产生调节作用。
股權激勵被視為解決研髮支齣中代理遲突的重要工具,但現有經驗證據併不穩定甚至相互矛盾。基于股權激勵異質性的視角,本文引入新的股權激勵特徵——股權激勵價值的股價及股價波動率敏感性,攷察股權激勵對企業研髮支齣的驅動機製,併利用2006-2012年我國實施股權激勵的上市公司作為樣本進行檢驗。研究髮現:股權激勵對企業研髮支齣的驅動機製包含風險規避效應與激勵效應兩箇相反維度,最終驅動方嚮與彊度取決于兩類效應的博弈;限製性股票的風險規避效應顯著彊于股票期權;股票期權的激勵效應顯著彊于限製性股票;市場競爭程度、企業產權性質與授予動機對限製性股票與股票期權的兩類效應產生調節作用。
고권격려피시위해결연발지출중대리충돌적중요공구,단현유경험증거병불은정심지상호모순。기우고권격려이질성적시각,본문인입신적고권격려특정——고권격려개치적고개급고개파동솔민감성,고찰고권격려대기업연발지출적구동궤제,병이용2006-2012년아국실시고권격려적상시공사작위양본진행검험。연구발현:고권격려대기업연발지출적구동궤제포함풍험규피효응여격려효응량개상반유도,최종구동방향여강도취결우량류효응적박혁;한제성고표적풍험규피효응현저강우고표기권;고표기권적격려효응현저강우한제성고표;시장경쟁정도、기업산권성질여수여동궤대한제성고표여고표기권적량류효응산생조절작용。
Equity incentive is treated as an essential tool to offset the conflict in the R&D expenditure decision, but the existing evidence is contradictory. Based on the perspective of incentive heterogeneity, this paper introduces two new characteris- tics of equity incentive which are the equity value share price sensitivity and equity value price volatility sensitivity. We firstly study the driving mechanism of equity incentive on R&D expenditure and the different mechanism among restricted stocks and options, and then do an empirical test with the data from 2006 to 2012. This paper finds equity incentive includes opposite impacts on R&D expenditure which are the risk aversion effect and the incentive effect. The ultimate driving force depends on the relative magnitudes of the two effects. Moreover, the restricted stock holds significantly stronger risk aversion effect and significantly weaker incentive effect than the option. This paper also finds that the extent of market competition, the property rights and the grant motive moderate the two effects.