中外法学
中外法學
중외법학
2015年
2期
469~483
,共null页
庭前会议 实证研究 改革
庭前會議 實證研究 改革
정전회의 실증연구 개혁
Pre- trial Conference; Empirical Study; Reform
实证分析表明,庭前会议的整体适用率较低,召开庭前会议的表面理由与法律规定趋于一致,而庭前会议的议题溢出了法律规定的范围。从效果层面观察,庭前会议立法所预设的目的并未完全实现,这突出表现为庭审效率提高有限、被告人的权利保障形式化以及庭审对抗性增效甚微。造成这种局面的原因主要有:庭前会议程序设计的“职权性”,庭前会议效果设置的“非完整性”,法官对庭前会议运用的“策略化”,以及庭审中心主义的缺失。未来应该在充分考量诉讼主体实际利益需求的基础上,按照对抗式的诉讼理念对庭前会议的相关程序设置进行必要的改革。
實證分析錶明,庭前會議的整體適用率較低,召開庭前會議的錶麵理由與法律規定趨于一緻,而庭前會議的議題溢齣瞭法律規定的範圍。從效果層麵觀察,庭前會議立法所預設的目的併未完全實現,這突齣錶現為庭審效率提高有限、被告人的權利保障形式化以及庭審對抗性增效甚微。造成這種跼麵的原因主要有:庭前會議程序設計的“職權性”,庭前會議效果設置的“非完整性”,法官對庭前會議運用的“策略化”,以及庭審中心主義的缺失。未來應該在充分攷量訴訟主體實際利益需求的基礎上,按照對抗式的訴訟理唸對庭前會議的相關程序設置進行必要的改革。
실증분석표명,정전회의적정체괄용솔교저,소개정전회의적표면이유여법률규정추우일치,이정전회의적의제일출료법률규정적범위。종효과층면관찰,정전회의입법소예설적목적병미완전실현,저돌출표현위정심효솔제고유한、피고인적권리보장형식화이급정심대항성증효심미。조성저충국면적원인주요유:정전회의정서설계적“직권성”,정전회의효과설치적“비완정성”,법관대정전회의운용적“책략화”,이급정심중심주의적결실。미래응해재충분고량소송주체실제이익수구적기출상,안조대항식적소송이념대정전회의적상관정서설치진행필요적개혁。
Empirical analysis shows that the overall application rate of pre--trial conference is rela-tively low; the reason to hold pre--trial conference is consistent with legal stipulation while the topic of pre--trial conference goes beyond the stipulated scope. From the perspective of effects, it is observed that the legislative purpose of pre--trial conference has not fully achieved, which prominently manifests the limited increase of trial's efficiency, formalization of the defendant's rights protection and slight en-hancement of adversarial trail. The main reasons for this situation include the “inquisitorial” design of pre -- trial conference ' s procedure , “non-- integrated” settings of pre-- trial conference ' s effects, “strategic” use of pre--trial conference by judges, as well as lack of trial centrism. In the future, it needs necessary reform of relevant procedural settings of pre--trial conference in accordance with the lawsuit concept of adversarial system, based on taking full account of real interests' needs of subject of litigation.