中外法学
中外法學
중외법학
2015年
2期
505~522
,共null页
信息技术 虚拟世界 主权 信息主权 辅助原则
信息技術 虛擬世界 主權 信息主權 輔助原則
신식기술 허의세계 주권 신식주권 보조원칙
Information Technology; Virtual World; Sovereignty; Informational Sovereignty; Princi-ple of Subsidiary
威斯特伐利亚体系中的主权概念总是与一定的地理空间相关联。虚拟世界与地理空间相对疏离,信息技术对主权概念构成冲击。其中,互联网技术对主权概念的冲击尤为强烈。应对这种冲击的进路包括区隔的进路和关联的进路。区隔的进路主张虚拟世界自身生成主权概念,这种主张无法逻辑圆融,其中的自由主义进路和制度主义进路均无法提供可行的实践方案,需要国家主权进入。关联的进路关注虚拟世界和真实世界的关联,着力思考国家对跨境信息流动的管制,形成强主权模式、弱主权模式和程序主义模式三种观点,各有优劣。信息主权是处理国家主权与信息技术关系的核心概念,包括信息保护权、信息管理权和信息资源共享权,信息主权的行使应符合辅助原则。
威斯特伐利亞體繫中的主權概唸總是與一定的地理空間相關聯。虛擬世界與地理空間相對疏離,信息技術對主權概唸構成遲擊。其中,互聯網技術對主權概唸的遲擊尤為彊烈。應對這種遲擊的進路包括區隔的進路和關聯的進路。區隔的進路主張虛擬世界自身生成主權概唸,這種主張無法邏輯圓融,其中的自由主義進路和製度主義進路均無法提供可行的實踐方案,需要國傢主權進入。關聯的進路關註虛擬世界和真實世界的關聯,著力思攷國傢對跨境信息流動的管製,形成彊主權模式、弱主權模式和程序主義模式三種觀點,各有優劣。信息主權是處理國傢主權與信息技術關繫的覈心概唸,包括信息保護權、信息管理權和信息資源共享權,信息主權的行使應符閤輔助原則。
위사특벌리아체계중적주권개념총시여일정적지리공간상관련。허의세계여지리공간상대소리,신식기술대주권개념구성충격。기중,호련망기술대주권개념적충격우위강렬。응대저충충격적진로포괄구격적진로화관련적진로。구격적진로주장허의세계자신생성주권개념,저충주장무법라집원융,기중적자유주의진로화제도주의진로균무법제공가행적실천방안,수요국가주권진입。관련적진로관주허의세계화진실세계적관련,착력사고국가대과경신식류동적관제,형성강주권모식、약주권모식화정서주의모식삼충관점,각유우렬。신식주권시처리국가주권여신식기술관계적핵심개념,포괄신식보호권、신식관리권화신식자원공향권,신식주권적행사응부합보조원칙。
The notion of sovereignty in Westphalia System always has connection with certain geo graphic space. The virtual world is relatively separated from geographic space, thereby the notion of sov- ereignty faces challenges from the information technology, especially the internet technology. There are two approaches to handle these challenges: the separated approach and the relational approach. The sepa rated approach which argues the virtual world can generate the notion of sovereignty by itself is not logi- cally self-consistent, and its two forms, i.e. liberalism and institutionalism, cannot provide a possible practice scheme, and therefore needs the nation to go in. The relational approach, focusing on the rela- tionship between the virtual world and the real world, and the regulation on the cross-border flow of in- formation by the State, presents three kinds of views: the mode of strong sovereignty, the mode of weak sovereignty and the proceduralism mode, each of which has merits and demerits. The informational sov- ereignty is the core concept in handling the relationship between the state sovereignty and the information technology, which includes the right to protect information, the right to regulate information and the right to share the information resource. The enforcement of the informational sovereignty should conform to the principle of subsidiarity.