CAJ | 학술논문

农民政治行为研究有两种分析框架,“底层社会与抗争性政治”分析框架渊源于农民政治行为“顺从与反抗”的经典模式,关注底层社会及其抗争性行动.“基层社会创造性政治”分析框架从三个方面批评“底层社会与抗争性政治”分析框架,一是认为其误解了1949年后的国家与农民关系;二是指控其革命意味太浓;三是认为其未看到农民抗争行动的创造性后果.同时,从重新界定当代中国国家与农民关系、以“基层社会”取代“底层社会”和以“创造性政治”取代“抗争性政治”三个方面建构自己的分析范式.二者在分析范式、研究对象和学术影响三个方面各有不同,融合二者,重构一个“底层社会与抗争-创造性政治”分析框架对农民政治行为研究具有重要意义.
농민정치행위연구유량충분석광가,“저층사회여항쟁성정치”분석광가연원우농민정치행위“순종여반항”적경전모식,관주저층사회급기항쟁성행동.“기층사회창조성정치”분석광가종삼개방면비평“저층사회여항쟁성정치”분석광가,일시인위기오해료1949년후적국가여농민관계;이시지공기혁명의미태농;삼시인위기미간도농민항쟁행동적창조성후과.동시,종중신계정당대중국국가여농민관계、이“기층사회”취대“저층사회”화이“창조성정치”취대“항쟁성정치”삼개방면건구자기적분석범식.이자재분석범식、연구대상화학술영향삼개방면각유불동,융합이자,중구일개“저층사회여항쟁-창조성정치”분석광가대농민정치행위연구구유중요의의.
There are two analytical frameworks for study peasant＇s political behavior, which are framework of ＂bottom so- ciety and contentious politics＂ and framework of grassroots society and creative politics. The former one origins in classical mode of peasant＇s political behavior, and pays much attention to the bottom society and contentious actions. While the lat- ter one critics the former one from three aspects：（ 1 ） its misunderstanding the relation between the state and the peasant ; （2） accusing its too much revolutionary meaning; （3） its ignoring the creative consequences of peasant＇ s contentious ac- tions. At the same time, the latter framework has constructed its own analysis paradigm from three directions, which are re- defining the relations between state and peasant in modern China; and replacing ＂bottom of society＂ by ＂grassroots socie- ty＂, and replacing ＂contentious politics＂ by ＂creative politics＂. Both of the frameworks are different from each other in three aspects, which are analysis paradigm, study object and academic impact. Integrating two frameworks so as to recon- struct a new framework of ＂bottom society and contentious and creative politics＂ will be of great importance for researching peasant＇s political behavior.