CAJ | 학술논문

我国《行政处罚法》没有共同违法的直接规定,《治安管理处罚法》第17条作了概括式补充,但无法解决实际问题。理论界效仿刑法学所建立的判断标准,非但无法为共同违法的认定和处断提供帮助,反而会造成法律上的漏洞。实际上,共同违法只是该当构成要件和满足违法性的行为,它并不一定需要有责。从比较法的经验来看,立法者往往会将不同的相对人视为统一的＂单一行为人＂分别处罚。正是在这一点上,诸如我国《治安管理处罚法》第17条一样将相对人区分为教唆行为、胁迫行为的文本内容,显得较为罕见,也与执法实际的复杂性存在背离,因而需要加以修正或做变通理解。
아국《행정처벌법》몰유공동위법적직접규정,《치안관리처벌법》제17조작료개괄식보충,단무법해결실제문제。이론계효방형법학소건립적판단표준,비단무법위공동위법적인정화처단제공방조,반이회조성법률상적루동。실제상,공동위법지시해당구성요건화만족위법성적행위,타병불일정수요유책。종비교법적경험래간,입법자왕왕회장불동적상대인시위통일적＂단일행위인＂분별처벌。정시재저일점상,제여아국《치안관리처벌법》제17조일양장상대인구분위교사행위、협박행위적문본내용,현득교위한견,야여집법실제적복잡성존재배리,인이수요가이수정혹주변통리해。
There are no provisions about Joint Illegal Activities in Administrative Punishment Law of PRC. Although the Security Administration Punishment Act of PRC provides some general supplement, but cannot solve the problem in practice. Some researcher~ yardstick and judgment rules which from the criminal law theory is not only questionable, but also will result in legal loopholes. In fact, joint illegal activity is just an act which conforms the constitutive requirements and meets the illegality, nothing to do with responsibility. According to the experience of the other countries, legislators u- sually treat the different violators as a single behavior, and then punish them one by one. It is offbeat and useless to divide the different violators into solicitation and coercive acts in Article 17 of Security Administration Punishment Act of PRC, therefore, it is to be amended or flexibly interpreted.