深圳大学学报:人文社会科学版
深圳大學學報:人文社會科學版
심수대학학보:인문사회과학판
Journal of Shenzhen University(Humanities & Social Sciences)
2015年
2期
73~78
,共null页
智的直觉 道德境界 审美境界 宗教境界
智的直覺 道德境界 審美境界 宗教境界
지적직각 도덕경계 심미경계 종교경계
intellectual intuition;moral jing-jie;aesthetics jing-jie;religious jing-jie
牟宗三“智的直觉”概念是从康德哲学中借用过来的,但却做了相应的改造。“智的直觉”在康德处是一个消极意义的概念,因其不承认人可以拥有智的直觉;而在牟宗三哲学中则具有积极意义,他正是以人可拥有“智的直觉”为出发点来建构其整个道德形上学体系。康德是在西方传统认识论的意义上考察“智的直觉”,而牟宗三则是在中国传统境界论意义上探讨“智的直觉”。牟宗三所言的智的直觉的呈现,不是指人通过自身的认识能力认知超越的本体,而是指人可通过实践的工夫达至超越的境界。此境界也不单单是指道德境界,而是包含了道德境界、审美境界、宗教境界的圆融之境。
牟宗三“智的直覺”概唸是從康德哲學中藉用過來的,但卻做瞭相應的改造。“智的直覺”在康德處是一箇消極意義的概唸,因其不承認人可以擁有智的直覺;而在牟宗三哲學中則具有積極意義,他正是以人可擁有“智的直覺”為齣髮點來建構其整箇道德形上學體繫。康德是在西方傳統認識論的意義上攷察“智的直覺”,而牟宗三則是在中國傳統境界論意義上探討“智的直覺”。牟宗三所言的智的直覺的呈現,不是指人通過自身的認識能力認知超越的本體,而是指人可通過實踐的工伕達至超越的境界。此境界也不單單是指道德境界,而是包含瞭道德境界、審美境界、宗教境界的圓融之境。
모종삼“지적직각”개념시종강덕철학중차용과래적,단각주료상응적개조。“지적직각”재강덕처시일개소겁의의적개념,인기불승인인가이옹유지적직각;이재모종삼철학중칙구유적겁의의,타정시이인가옹유“지적직각”위출발점래건구기정개도덕형상학체계。강덕시재서방전통인식론적의의상고찰“지적직각”,이모종삼칙시재중국전통경계론의의상탐토“지적직각”。모종삼소언적지적직각적정현,불시지인통과자신적인식능력인지초월적본체,이시지인가통과실천적공부체지초월적경계。차경계야불단단시지도덕경계,이시포함료도덕경계、심미경계、종교경계적원융지경。
MOU Zong-san borrows the concept of ”intellectual intuition” from Kant as the core concept of his own philosophy and makes some alterations to it. For Kant, ”intellectual intuition” is a passive concept because he rejects that human being is able to have intellectual intuition. However, it is active in MOU's philosophy because his whole system of ethical metaphysics is based on that human being is able to own intellectual intuition. Kant discusses intellectual intuition in terms of traditional epistemology, while MOU Zong-san discusses it in terms of the traditional Chinese theory of ”jing-jie”. To MOU, the presentation of intellectual intuition does not mean one can cognize a transcendent substance through his cognitive ability; instead, it means one can achieve a transcendent jing-jie through practice. This jing-jie is not merely a moral concept, but a perfect state in terms of morality, aesthetics and religion.