西部论坛
西部論罈
서부론단
West Forum
2015年
3期
9~15
,共null页
“村改居”群体 城市社会融入 经济资本 人力资本 就业收入 文化程度 劳动技能 社会支持 城市社会经济活动
“村改居”群體 城市社會融入 經濟資本 人力資本 就業收入 文化程度 勞動技能 社會支持 城市社會經濟活動
“촌개거”군체 성시사회융입 경제자본 인력자본 취업수입 문화정도 노동기능 사회지지 성시사회경제활동
“Village-to-Community” group;urban society integration;economic capita;human capital;employment income;education level;labor skills;social support;urban social economic activity
社会融入是社会行动的结果,而经济活动是社会行动的首要活动。根据对陕西省西安市的调查数据,以“是否持续参与城市社会经济活动”考量“村改居”群体的城市社会融入与否,运用二元Logistic回归模型,从自身特征、经济资本、人力资本和社会支持4个方面分析“村改居”群体城市社会融入的影响因素,结果表明:“村改居”群体的城市社会融入与年龄、性别等自身条件无关,经济资本中分红、房租等可替代收入变量和人力资本中高层次职业变量的影响不显著,社会支持等外部因素的影响也不显著;交往能力和政策制度变量在各自的类别模型中对“村改居”群体的城市社会融入具有显著影响,但未能进入最终模型;就业收入、文化程度和一技之长对“村改居”群体的城市社会融入具有显著正向。因此,“村改居”群体提高就业收入和文化程度以及拥有一技之长,均有助于其城市社会融入进程。
社會融入是社會行動的結果,而經濟活動是社會行動的首要活動。根據對陝西省西安市的調查數據,以“是否持續參與城市社會經濟活動”攷量“村改居”群體的城市社會融入與否,運用二元Logistic迴歸模型,從自身特徵、經濟資本、人力資本和社會支持4箇方麵分析“村改居”群體城市社會融入的影響因素,結果錶明:“村改居”群體的城市社會融入與年齡、性彆等自身條件無關,經濟資本中分紅、房租等可替代收入變量和人力資本中高層次職業變量的影響不顯著,社會支持等外部因素的影響也不顯著;交往能力和政策製度變量在各自的類彆模型中對“村改居”群體的城市社會融入具有顯著影響,但未能進入最終模型;就業收入、文化程度和一技之長對“村改居”群體的城市社會融入具有顯著正嚮。因此,“村改居”群體提高就業收入和文化程度以及擁有一技之長,均有助于其城市社會融入進程。
사회융입시사회행동적결과,이경제활동시사회행동적수요활동。근거대합서성서안시적조사수거,이“시부지속삼여성시사회경제활동”고량“촌개거”군체적성시사회융입여부,운용이원Logistic회귀모형,종자신특정、경제자본、인력자본화사회지지4개방면분석“촌개거”군체성시사회융입적영향인소,결과표명:“촌개거”군체적성시사회융입여년령、성별등자신조건무관,경제자본중분홍、방조등가체대수입변량화인력자본중고층차직업변량적영향불현저,사회지지등외부인소적영향야불현저;교왕능력화정책제도변량재각자적유별모형중대“촌개거”군체적성시사회융입구유현저영향,단미능진입최종모형;취업수입、문화정도화일기지장대“촌개거”군체적성시사회융입구유현저정향。인차,“촌개거”군체제고취업수입화문화정도이급옹유일기지장,균유조우기성시사회융입진정。
Social integration is the result of social action, in which economic activity takes the first place. In view of survey data from Xi’ an, Shanxi Province, this study empirically analyzes the urban integration of “Village-to-Community” group and the influencing factors by means of binary Logical model from the perspectives of own characteristics, economic capital, human capital and social support with the urban society integration standard that whether the “Village-to-Community” group are willing to persistently participate in urban social economic activity. The result shows that there is no relation between urban society integration of “Village-to-Community”group and own characteristics such as age, gender, etc.;alternative income variables such as dividend, house rent of economic capital don’ t play significant role, nor do high level professional variables in human capital or external influence such as social support; ability of communication and policy variables have significant influence in their own class models but not the final model;employment income, education level and specialty are very positive in the integration. Therefore, income increase, higher education level and having specialty is helpful to accelerate the urban integration process for “Village-to-Community” group.