东北师大学报:哲学社会科学版
東北師大學報:哲學社會科學版
동북사대학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Northeast Normal University(Social Science)
2015年
3期
116~121
,共null页
白鸟库吉 顾颉刚 “疑古” 比较
白鳥庫吉 顧頡剛 “疑古” 比較
백조고길 고힐강 “의고” 비교
Shiratori Kurakichi; Jiegang Gu; "Suspecting the Past" ; Comparison
白鸟库吉是日本东洋文献学派的创立者,提出了著名的"尧舜禹抹杀论"。他带领其弟子对中国史展开了广泛的研究,并在中国东北史和朝鲜史研究中取得丰硕成果。顾颉刚是中国"古史辨"派的领袖,首倡民国"疑古"之风,后创办《禹贡》半月刊,掀起中国边疆史地的研究热潮。二者的研究似乎存在诸多相似之处。同时,二者学术起源之"疑古"观念亦存在某些共性特征。本文以顾氏与白鸟氏对《禹贡》的考辩为出发点,比较二者"疑古"思想的学术渊源、辨析方法与观点倾向,试图探究二者在学术上是否存在承继关系。
白鳥庫吉是日本東洋文獻學派的創立者,提齣瞭著名的"堯舜禹抹殺論"。他帶領其弟子對中國史展開瞭廣汎的研究,併在中國東北史和朝鮮史研究中取得豐碩成果。顧頡剛是中國"古史辨"派的領袖,首倡民國"疑古"之風,後創辦《禹貢》半月刊,掀起中國邊疆史地的研究熱潮。二者的研究似乎存在諸多相似之處。同時,二者學術起源之"疑古"觀唸亦存在某些共性特徵。本文以顧氏與白鳥氏對《禹貢》的攷辯為齣髮點,比較二者"疑古"思想的學術淵源、辨析方法與觀點傾嚮,試圖探究二者在學術上是否存在承繼關繫。
백조고길시일본동양문헌학파적창립자,제출료저명적"요순우말살론"。타대령기제자대중국사전개료엄범적연구,병재중국동북사화조선사연구중취득봉석성과。고힐강시중국"고사변"파적령수,수창민국"의고"지풍,후창판《우공》반월간,흔기중국변강사지적연구열조。이자적연구사호존재제다상사지처。동시,이자학술기원지"의고"관념역존재모사공성특정。본문이고씨여백조씨대《우공》적고변위출발점,비교이자"의고"사상적학술연원、변석방법여관점경향,시도탐구이자재학술상시부존재승계관계。
Shiratori Kurakichi,founder of the school of oriental literature study, has made an extensive study of Chinese history with the assistance of his students,after proposing the famous viewpoint of denying the reality of Three Emperors, i. e. Yao,Shun and Yu. He has obtained fruitful results especially in the historical study of northeast China and Korea. J iegang Gu,leader of the School of Doubting Ancient History in China,has initiated the trend of "suspecting the past" in historical research. He also established a popular magazine Yu Gong which issued semimonthly. This very magazine has popularized the study of borderland history of China. There are many common features between Shiratori and Gu's research careers. Moreover, both of their academic studies derived from the idea of suspecting the past. This article attempts to compare their attitudes toward Yu Gong, and find out the theoretical origin of the research method of "suspecting the past" ,and hammer out ways to discriminate their methods and inclinations. Therefore, we may figure out whether there is an academical inheritance relationship between these two scholars.