CAJ | 학술논문

厘清高校内部治理风险的特性、表现类型及其诱因复杂性程度的结构性逻辑关系,有助于为高校在办学和治理实践中确立科学的风险防控理念以及构建系统灵敏的风险防控机制提供新的视角。高校内部治理风险的本质是包括利益公开、利益回避、利益协调和利益监督等要素的防范利益冲突机制的缺失,导致内部核心利益主体相互之间不能有效共享治理权力、分担治理责任,高校的公平与效率无法得到真正彰显。高校政治权力、行政权力、学术权力和民主监督权力运行过程中主要存在战略风险、管理风险、财务风险、廉政风险和质量风险等五类风险。内部治理风险的作用机理包括风险源、触发行为、风险点和传导路径等要素,风险源则由环境因素和主体因素双重作用生成,不同的风险源之间存在特定的张力效应和互动博弈。
전청고교내부치리풍험적특성、표현류형급기유인복잡성정도적결구성라집관계,유조우위고교재판학화치리실천중학립과학적풍험방공이념이급구건계통령민적풍험방공궤제제공신적시각。고교내부치리풍험적본질시포괄이익공개、이익회피、이익협조화이익감독등요소적방범이익충돌궤제적결실,도치내부핵심이익주체상호지간불능유효공향치리권력、분담치리책임,고교적공평여효솔무법득도진정창현。고교정치권력、행정권력、학술권력화민주감독권력운행과정중주요존재전략풍험、관리풍험、재무풍험、렴정풍험화질량풍험등오류풍험。내부치리풍험적작용궤리포괄풍험원、촉발행위、풍험점화전도로경등요소,풍험원칙유배경인소화주체인소쌍중작용생성,불동적풍험원지간존재특정적장력효응화호동박혁。
With the advance of popularization, internationalization and marketization of higheducation, the social and economic activities that higher education institutions participate in have become increasingly multivariate, open and complicated, but in the meanwhile numerouspotential risks frequently appear in their internal governance. As the basis of carrying out the risk prevention and control, identifying and judging characteristics, expressive types and degree ofcomplexity of risk inducements will exerts great impacts on pertinence, enforcement, progress and effect o[ prevention and control practices. Implementation of inner governance depends on establishing an integrated network system that possesses complex, scientific and complete functions, with its inherent stipulation being ableto realize reasonable allocation of authority and responsibility and adjust the conflict and game of interest groups. If governance structure is designed irrationally or power-responsibility has been in inappropriate and poor operation, negative deviations occur in governance goal and idea, which are called inner governance risks. The risks derive from the inertia and resistance in the condition that is present in the conflict between the operation of the power and responsibility system and the inner logic and value pursuit of the internal governance system. When the inertia and resistance go beyond the limit of self-organizing function in higher education institutions, it will produce disorder and chaos. Internal governance risks are essentially that core interest subjects can＇t share power and responsibility of governance effectively and jointly, so that equity and efficiency are barely realized. Internal governance risks are divided into strategic risk, managerial risk, financial risk, integrity risk and quality risk. Diverse kinds of risks are often hidden under every operation link of political power, executive power, academic power and power of democratic supervision, and then combine organically to constitute a risk cluster. Risk mechanism of action includes risk source, triggered behavior, risk point and conducting pathway. Risk experiences the evolution process from sprout, generation, diffusion to chain reaction, which shows the unification of asymptotic and mutational properties. Because of the evident academic feature, various power forms, intertwined and highly decentralized internal interests chains as well as loosely organized state of higher education institutions, inner governance risk has enhanced in terms of uncertainly, complex variability, interaction and chain reaction. There exist Environment factor and subject factor in risk sources, between which multiple penetration and influence under the tension come into play. Firstly, the catalyzing or formulation of risks can happen simultaneously, which will expand the risks in the internal structure and push the spread of risks like adding fuel to the flames. The second is that suppressing metabolism will lead to waxing and waning and make risk transmission produce deviating inflexion, the result of which would in turn cause risk source in accumulation and sedimentation to be deconstructed and released partly. However, the core elements of the old risk structure will not change fundamentally, and will continue to develop and extend when meeting some triggers again. Lastly and what really counts is that the accumulation or liberation of risk sources relies on the person＇s subjective initiative, which will inevitably fluctuate along with reciprocal game between environmental and subjective factors. It is the choices of actors that can radically transform the relationship in the risk structure.