中国文化研究
中國文化研究
중국문화연구
Chinese Culture Research
2015年
2期
141~157
,共null页
黄宗羲 《明夷待访录》 待访对象
黃宗羲 《明夷待訪錄》 待訪對象
황종희 《명이대방록》 대방대상
Huang Zongxi; ＂Ming yi Treated Visits Record＂ ; Treated direction
《明夷待访录》集中体现了黄宗羲的政治哲学,学界对其待访对象的研究尚无定论,值得再思考。我们首先就学界讨论《明夷待访录》待访对象的论证过程和所持依据从三个方面进行了反驳,进而从比较《留书》和《明夷待访录》中黄宗羲对待清朝态度的变化、黄宗羲对社会二十年后进入盛世的预测、黄宗羲的朋友门人等对其人其书的评价、黄宗羲＂天命观＂以及对清朝的政治与文化认同等个方面深入分析,得出结论——黄宗羲待访的＂后王＂是清朝君主。黄宗羲之所以异常隐晦表达自我的政治立场,主要是其＂理性认同＂与＂情感认同＂发生着激烈尖锐的冲突。
《明夷待訪錄》集中體現瞭黃宗羲的政治哲學,學界對其待訪對象的研究尚無定論,值得再思攷。我們首先就學界討論《明夷待訪錄》待訪對象的論證過程和所持依據從三箇方麵進行瞭反駁,進而從比較《留書》和《明夷待訪錄》中黃宗羲對待清朝態度的變化、黃宗羲對社會二十年後進入盛世的預測、黃宗羲的朋友門人等對其人其書的評價、黃宗羲＂天命觀＂以及對清朝的政治與文化認同等箇方麵深入分析,得齣結論——黃宗羲待訪的＂後王＂是清朝君主。黃宗羲之所以異常隱晦錶達自我的政治立場,主要是其＂理性認同＂與＂情感認同＂髮生著激烈尖銳的遲突。
《명이대방록》집중체현료황종희적정치철학,학계대기대방대상적연구상무정론,치득재사고。아문수선취학계토론《명이대방록》대방대상적론증과정화소지의거종삼개방면진행료반박,진이종비교《류서》화《명이대방록》중황종희대대청조태도적변화、황종희대사회이십년후진입성세적예측、황종희적붕우문인등대기인기서적평개、황종희＂천명관＂이급대청조적정치여문화인동등개방면심입분석,득출결론——황종희대방적＂후왕＂시청조군주。황종희지소이이상은회표체자아적정치립장,주요시기＂이성인동＂여＂정감인동＂발생착격렬첨예적충돌。
＂ Ming yi Treated Visits Record ＂ concentracts to manifest the political philosophy of Huang Zongxi . However, ＂Ming yi Treated Visits Record＂ is waiting for whom, the academic circles still have no conclusion, and it derserves us to think twice . Firstly, we argued against the proving process and basis of the treated direction in ＂Ming yi Treated Visits Record＂ which discussed by the academic circles in three apects. And then, we came to a conclusion that the emperor of the Qing Dynasty is the whom Huang Zongxi waiting for from different attitudes of Huang Zongxi towards Qing Dynasty comparing the ＂Keeps Book＂ and ＂Ming yi TreatedVisits Record＂, the prediction of Huang Zongxi that Qing Dynasty would come to prosperity in 20 years, the evaluation to Huang Zongxi and his books from Huang Zongxi＇ s friends, Hunag＇s ＂Destiny View＂ and his approval torwards the politics and culture of Qing Dynasty and so on. As the main result of the great conflict between ＂the rational approval＂ and ＂the emotion approval＂, Huang Zongxi expressed his political standpoint in an extramely obscure way.
