CAJ | 학술논문

美国的检察官在进行控诉时享有完全的自由裁量权,但是,＂起诉无效＂与自由裁量的考查基准有着很大的差异,前者有证据、目的、成本、法律规范,而这些要素不属自由裁量的考虑范畴。如果对＂起诉无效＂进行事实描述,可以得出＂起诉无效＂的概念只是对成熟的＂陪审无效＂制度的模拟或类推;如果对＂起诉无效＂进行原因描述,除上述要素外,价值观、社会正义、公共利益、当事人权利等也是必须的考量因素。
미국적검찰관재진행공소시향유완전적자유재량권,단시,＂기소무효＂여자유재량적고사기준유착흔대적차이,전자유증거、목적、성본、법률규범,이저사요소불속자유재량적고필범주。여과대＂기소무효＂진행사실묘술,가이득출＂기소무효＂적개념지시대성숙적＂배심무효＂제도적모의혹유추;여과대＂기소무효＂진행원인묘술,제상술요소외,개치관、사회정의、공공이익、당사인권리등야시필수적고량인소。
Prosecutors enjoy complete discretion in indictment, from the perspective of subjective and objective conditions, Nullification and discretion have importantdifferences, the elements of nullification lie in evidence , objectives, costs, legal norms, and these elements are not discretionary area of consideration, if we have factual description on nullification, we find that the concept of Prosecutorial nullification is analog or analogy of mature of jury nullification; if we have description of reason, in addition to the above factors, the values, social justice, the public interest, for the sake of parties and son on must be in the scope of reference.