中国行政管理
中國行政管理
중국행정관리
Chinese Public Administration
2015年
6期
53~57
,共null页
推进模式 城镇化 地方政府 经营城市 土地开发
推進模式 城鎮化 地方政府 經營城市 土地開髮
추진모식 성진화 지방정부 경영성시 토지개발
development mode, urbanization, local government, city management, land development
中国城镇化"推进模式"表现为地方政府在经营城市的理念下,通过单一的土地开发方式推进城镇发展,行政科层运作取代了市场和公民参与机制是其内在本质特征。城镇化"推进模式"与地方间竞争、土地财政依赖、制度安排模糊等因素高度相关。地方政府的强力推进保证了城镇化的高速发展和各类项目的大规模实施,却也带来了市场动力不足、土地城镇化、公共服务超载、城镇空间无序扩张以及利益冲突加剧等现实问题。为了化解城镇化"推进模式"带来的负面效应,应坚持走新型城镇化道路,采取硬化权力约束、转换动力机制、明晰制度规则、重构激励体系以及消除行政壁垒等政策措施,不断增强城镇可持续发展的能力。
中國城鎮化"推進模式"錶現為地方政府在經營城市的理唸下,通過單一的土地開髮方式推進城鎮髮展,行政科層運作取代瞭市場和公民參與機製是其內在本質特徵。城鎮化"推進模式"與地方間競爭、土地財政依賴、製度安排模糊等因素高度相關。地方政府的彊力推進保證瞭城鎮化的高速髮展和各類項目的大規模實施,卻也帶來瞭市場動力不足、土地城鎮化、公共服務超載、城鎮空間無序擴張以及利益遲突加劇等現實問題。為瞭化解城鎮化"推進模式"帶來的負麵效應,應堅持走新型城鎮化道路,採取硬化權力約束、轉換動力機製、明晰製度規則、重構激勵體繫以及消除行政壁壘等政策措施,不斷增彊城鎮可持續髮展的能力。
중국성진화"추진모식"표현위지방정부재경영성시적이념하,통과단일적토지개발방식추진성진발전,행정과층운작취대료시장화공민삼여궤제시기내재본질특정。성진화"추진모식"여지방간경쟁、토지재정의뢰、제도안배모호등인소고도상관。지방정부적강력추진보증료성진화적고속발전화각류항목적대규모실시,각야대래료시장동력불족、토지성진화、공공복무초재、성진공간무서확장이급이익충돌가극등현실문제。위료화해성진화"추진모식"대래적부면효응,응견지주신형성진화도로,채취경화권력약속、전환동력궤제、명석제도규칙、중구격려체계이급소제행정벽루등정책조시,불단증강성진가지속발전적능력。
The "development mode" of the urbanization in China acts in the way that under the thought of city manage- ment, local government promotes the development of the urban through a simple way of land development, with its internal characteristic that operation of administrative bureaucracy replaced market and citizen participation mechanisms. The "development mode" of urbanization is highly correlated with factors including local govern- ment competition, land financial dependence and vague institutional arrangements. Although the strong push of local government ensure the rapid development of urbanization and large - scale implementation of various pro- jects, it brings a set of practical issues as Bell, like the shortage of market forces, land urbanization, overloa- ded public services, urban sprawl and exacerbation of interest conflicts and so on. In order to resolve negative impact of urban development mode, the government should keep firmly on the new urbanization path, take a se- ries of measures that can strengthen market forces, harden power constraints, convert dynamic mechanism, clarify institution rules, remodel system of local government incentives, and eliminate administration bulwark so as to constantly enhance the capacity of urban sustainable development.