中国人口资源与环境
中國人口資源與環境
중국인구자원여배경
China Polulation.Resources and Environment
2015年
6期
30~36
,共null页
气候变化 分配方案 不确定性 温升目标 IPCC第五次评估报告
氣候變化 分配方案 不確定性 溫升目標 IPCC第五次評估報告
기후변화 분배방안 불학정성 온승목표 IPCC제오차평고보고
climate change ; allocation schemes; uncertainty; temperature increase target; IPCC 5th assessment report
鉴于全球温升目标到各国减排承诺转换过程中面临的各种不确定性,本文以IPCC第五次评估报告中2℃温升目标对应的排放空间为基础。探讨了不同排放路径、基准情景、分配方案及方案关键参数的选择对各国碳配额的影响。研究得出:较发展中国家,分配方案的不同会给发达国家碳配颧带来更大不确定性.且当前排放水平与全球平均值差异越大的国家。不确定性越大:分配方案中关键参数的不同也会对结果有一定影响。如趋同类方案中的趋同时间、历史责任方案的累积起始年和逐步参与方案的参与阈值等,且累计起始年越早、参与阈值越高对发展中国家越为有利;全球允许碳排放空间对各国碳配额有较大影响,发达国家的碳配额(多方案的均值)呈现随全球排放空间增大.增幅更大的特征,而发展中国家的此变化趋势则相反;除部分有参与阈值的方案外。基准情景引起的不确定性相对较小。尽管存在各种不确定性,但可以确定的是在全球2℃温升目标下。各国未来的碳配额是非常有限的.我国也不例外。故我们应着眼未来、长远规划。同时当前应做好低碳能源布局.为应对气候变化夯实基础。
鑒于全毬溫升目標到各國減排承諾轉換過程中麵臨的各種不確定性,本文以IPCC第五次評估報告中2℃溫升目標對應的排放空間為基礎。探討瞭不同排放路徑、基準情景、分配方案及方案關鍵參數的選擇對各國碳配額的影響。研究得齣:較髮展中國傢,分配方案的不同會給髮達國傢碳配顴帶來更大不確定性.且噹前排放水平與全毬平均值差異越大的國傢。不確定性越大:分配方案中關鍵參數的不同也會對結果有一定影響。如趨同類方案中的趨同時間、歷史責任方案的纍積起始年和逐步參與方案的參與閾值等,且纍計起始年越早、參與閾值越高對髮展中國傢越為有利;全毬允許碳排放空間對各國碳配額有較大影響,髮達國傢的碳配額(多方案的均值)呈現隨全毬排放空間增大.增幅更大的特徵,而髮展中國傢的此變化趨勢則相反;除部分有參與閾值的方案外。基準情景引起的不確定性相對較小。儘管存在各種不確定性,但可以確定的是在全毬2℃溫升目標下。各國未來的碳配額是非常有限的.我國也不例外。故我們應著眼未來、長遠規劃。同時噹前應做好低碳能源佈跼.為應對氣候變化夯實基礎。
감우전구온승목표도각국감배승낙전환과정중면림적각충불학정성,본문이IPCC제오차평고보고중2℃온승목표대응적배방공간위기출。탐토료불동배방로경、기준정경、분배방안급방안관건삼수적선택대각국탄배액적영향。연구득출:교발전중국가,분배방안적불동회급발체국가탄배권대래경대불학정성.차당전배방수평여전구평균치차이월대적국가。불학정성월대:분배방안중관건삼수적불동야회대결과유일정영향。여추동류방안중적추동시간、역사책임방안적루적기시년화축보삼여방안적삼여역치등,차루계기시년월조、삼여역치월고대발전중국가월위유리;전구윤허탄배방공간대각국탄배액유교대영향,발체국가적탄배액(다방안적균치)정현수전구배방공간증대.증폭경대적특정,이발전중국가적차변화추세칙상반;제부분유삼여역치적방안외。기준정경인기적불학정성상대교소。진관존재각충불학정성,단가이학정적시재전구2℃온승목표하。각국미래적탄배액시비상유한적.아국야불예외。고아문응착안미래、장원규화。동시당전응주호저탄능원포국.위응대기후변화항실기출。
Due to the uncertainty associated with the transition from global warming target to national commitments on emissions reduction, this study analyzed the impacts on national carbon quotas with various emission pathways, baseline scenarios, allocation schemes and parameters associated with these schemes, which are based on the emissions capacity as a result of the global warming target of two-degree temperature increase identified in the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of IPCC. The results indicated that: (~) various schemes for quota allocation resulted in higher uncertainty for developed countries than developing countries, and the uncertainty was even higher for countries that have greater differences between their current emissions and the global average ; (~) within the same allocation scheme, quota allocation varied from the selection of key parameters, such as, convergence time, starting year for historical responsibility and participation threshold, and developing countries would obtain greater carbon quotas with earlier starting year for responsibility and higher participation threshold; (~) The global carbon allowable capacity had a great impact on each country' s carbon permits, and with the increase of global capacity, it would result in a larger increase in quotas for developed countries than developing countries; (~) The uncertainty in quota allocation brought by the differences in baseline scenarios is relatively low under most allocation schemes, expect those schemes with thresholds. Despite of the uncertainties, it is certain that future emissions spaces for all countries including China are limited under the global warming target of two-degree temperature increase. We should conduct long-term planning on low-carbon development, develop low-carbon technologies, and invest on related research concurrently.