天津商业大学学报
天津商業大學學報
천진상업대학학보
Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce
2015年
3期
32~39
,共null页
谢春红 于玉 徐虹 黄梓莹
謝春紅 于玉 徐虹 黃梓瑩
사춘홍 우옥 서홍 황재형
居民迁出 遗产保护 文化传承 社区参与旅游 翠亨村
居民遷齣 遺產保護 文化傳承 社區參與旅遊 翠亨村
거민천출 유산보호 문화전승 사구삼여여유 취형촌
inhabitants' out-migration; heritage protection; cultural inheritance; community participation in tourism;Cuiheng Village
我国古村落保护存在一个不容忽视的问题,即注重村落建筑的物质实体而忽视了作为社区主体的居民及其承载的社区文化。文章以孙中山故居所在地翠亨村为例,采用深度访谈、问卷调查和二手资料收集等方法,综合了社区、居民、游客、景区管理方四个维度,系统地对我国早期的"居民迁出"式遗产保护路径的效果展开评价和反思,研究发现:"居民迁出"式遗产保护模式对遗产地部分的物质遗产的保护取得一定效果,但忽视了居民这一文化遗产保护的主体和文化载体,造成了社区居民对村落文化认同的淡漠;翠亨村旅游发展后,孙中山故居越来越成为旅游符号,由于缺乏有效的社区参与途径,大部分居民无法实际参与旅游中,进而无法有效地认识到文化遗产保护的重要性;故居管委会在旅游发展的背景下囿于资金和人力的不足,面临遗产保护和旅游管理的双重困境。社区居民在遗产保护和旅游发展中的集体"缺位"是造成翠亨村现状的关键原因。
我國古村落保護存在一箇不容忽視的問題,即註重村落建築的物質實體而忽視瞭作為社區主體的居民及其承載的社區文化。文章以孫中山故居所在地翠亨村為例,採用深度訪談、問捲調查和二手資料收集等方法,綜閤瞭社區、居民、遊客、景區管理方四箇維度,繫統地對我國早期的"居民遷齣"式遺產保護路徑的效果展開評價和反思,研究髮現:"居民遷齣"式遺產保護模式對遺產地部分的物質遺產的保護取得一定效果,但忽視瞭居民這一文化遺產保護的主體和文化載體,造成瞭社區居民對村落文化認同的淡漠;翠亨村旅遊髮展後,孫中山故居越來越成為旅遊符號,由于缺乏有效的社區參與途徑,大部分居民無法實際參與旅遊中,進而無法有效地認識到文化遺產保護的重要性;故居管委會在旅遊髮展的揹景下囿于資金和人力的不足,麵臨遺產保護和旅遊管理的雙重睏境。社區居民在遺產保護和旅遊髮展中的集體"缺位"是造成翠亨村現狀的關鍵原因。
아국고촌락보호존재일개불용홀시적문제,즉주중촌락건축적물질실체이홀시료작위사구주체적거민급기승재적사구문화。문장이손중산고거소재지취형촌위례,채용심도방담、문권조사화이수자료수집등방법,종합료사구、거민、유객、경구관리방사개유도,계통지대아국조기적"거민천출"식유산보호로경적효과전개평개화반사,연구발현:"거민천출"식유산보호모식대유산지부분적물질유산적보호취득일정효과,단홀시료거민저일문화유산보호적주체화문화재체,조성료사구거민대촌락문화인동적담막;취형촌여유발전후,손중산고거월래월성위여유부호,유우결핍유효적사구삼여도경,대부분거민무법실제삼여여유중,진이무법유효지인식도문화유산보호적중요성;고거관위회재여유발전적배경하유우자금화인력적불족,면림유산보호화여유관리적쌍중곤경。사구거민재유산보호화여유발전중적집체"결위"시조성취형촌현상적관건원인。
There has been a noticeable issue in the protection of historic villages in China, that's to say, people usually focus on the physical architecture rather than the community inhabitants and community culture. Based on the case study of Cuiheng Village, where Sun Yat-sen's Former Residence is located, the paper, with the methods of depth interview, questionnaire and second-hand data collection, evaluates and reflects on heritage protection path of inhabitants' out-mi- gration from the four dimensions of management of community, inhabitant, tourist and scenic spot. The findings are as follows: the heritage protection mode of inhabitants' out-migration has some positive effects on the physical heritage ; however, there exists the negligence of inhabitants who are the subjects of cultural heritage protection and cultural carri- ers, which results in inhabitants' low consciousness of village cultural identity ; with the development of Cuiheng Village tourism, Sun Yat-sen' s Former Residence has increasingly become a tourism symbol, but most inhabitants have little ac- cess to tourism industry and are unable to realize the importance of cultural heritage protection due to the lack of effective community participation; and the administrative committee of Sun Yat-sen's Former Residence is in a dilemma between heritage protection and tourism development because of the lack of funds and hmnan resources. The collective absence of community inhabitants in heritage protection and tourism development is the key reason for the situation of Cuiheng Vil- lage.