地域研究与开发
地域研究與開髮
지역연구여개발
Areal Research and Development
2015年
3期
118~123
,共null页
城乡建设用地 集约利用模式 海南省
城鄉建設用地 集約利用模式 海南省
성향건설용지 집약이용모식 해남성
urban and rural construction land; intensive use patterns; Hainan Province
基于对城镇与农村居民点功能的认知,分别构建指标体系,采用全排列多边形图示指数法对海南省城乡建设用地集约利用水平进行定量评价,据此划分地域类型,并提出集约利用模式。海南省各市县城镇用地集约水平呈现南北分异格局,经济发展阶段、产业结构、投入水平等经济因子是强化空间分异的主导因素;农村居民点用地集约水平表现为西高东低格局,历史发展基础是差异形成的根本原因;中部市县由于自然地理条件与区位条件较差,其城乡建设用地集约水平普遍较低。提出了土地市场导向、城乡增减挂钩、"控增逼存"、产业-用地协调增长4种集约利用模式,各市县应依据主导因素,选择不同模式来促进其城乡建设用地集约利用水平。研究结果可为分类引导海南省城乡建设用地节约集约利用提供科学参考。
基于對城鎮與農村居民點功能的認知,分彆構建指標體繫,採用全排列多邊形圖示指數法對海南省城鄉建設用地集約利用水平進行定量評價,據此劃分地域類型,併提齣集約利用模式。海南省各市縣城鎮用地集約水平呈現南北分異格跼,經濟髮展階段、產業結構、投入水平等經濟因子是彊化空間分異的主導因素;農村居民點用地集約水平錶現為西高東低格跼,歷史髮展基礎是差異形成的根本原因;中部市縣由于自然地理條件與區位條件較差,其城鄉建設用地集約水平普遍較低。提齣瞭土地市場導嚮、城鄉增減掛鉤、"控增逼存"、產業-用地協調增長4種集約利用模式,各市縣應依據主導因素,選擇不同模式來促進其城鄉建設用地集約利用水平。研究結果可為分類引導海南省城鄉建設用地節約集約利用提供科學參攷。
기우대성진여농촌거민점공능적인지,분별구건지표체계,채용전배렬다변형도시지수법대해남성성향건설용지집약이용수평진행정량평개,거차화분지역류형,병제출집약이용모식。해남성각시현성진용지집약수평정현남북분이격국,경제발전계단、산업결구、투입수평등경제인자시강화공간분이적주도인소;농촌거민점용지집약수평표현위서고동저격국,역사발전기출시차이형성적근본원인;중부시현유우자연지리조건여구위조건교차,기성향건설용지집약수평보편교저。제출료토지시장도향、성향증감괘구、"공증핍존"、산업-용지협조증장4충집약이용모식,각시현응의거주도인소,선택불동모식래촉진기성향건설용지집약이용수평。연구결과가위분류인도해남성성향건설용지절약집약이용제공과학삼고。
Based on correctly understanding the functions of urban and rural construction land, the paper hasbuilt two index systems and introduced a new method to quantify intensive use level of urban and rural constructionland, then divided the result to different types and presented four intensive use patterns. It shows that there has dif-ferentiation between north and south counties on urban construction land intensive use level; the economic factors,such as developing phase of economy, industrial structure and investing level, have put a dominated role to solidifythis pattern during the research period. For rural residential land, the intensive use level of west counties is roughlyhigher than that of the east counties; the historical development foundation is basic reason for this differentiation.While, intensive use levels of urban-rural construction land of central counties are generally low because their phys-ical-geographical and location conditions are relatively worse than that of the other counties. Moreover, the paperputs forward four intensive-use patterns, namely supplying land by market-oriented, balancing increase and reduc-tion in urban-rural construction land, controlling increase to compel stock land using intensively and increasing co-ordinately of industries and land, to prompt those counties using their land resources savingly and intensively.