CAJ | 학술논문

本研究目的主要探索采用跑步经济性测量相关指标基于乔治预测法评估最大摄氧量（（V）O2max）的可靠性.研究思路通过Bland-Altman方法来比较（V）O2max乔治预测法和实验室测试法的一致性.研究对象选择8名受过良好中长跑训练的运动系学生,受试者的基本情况：年龄（21.50±0.53）岁、身高（172.2±3.89）cm、体重（63.2±3.72）kg.第一天测试（V）O2max,隔日在跑台以次最大强度下测试跑步经济性相关指标（摄氧量、心率、体重等）.研究结果发现,通过乔治预测法估算获得8名受试者的（V）O2max值比实验测试值略高,但通过配对样本t检验发现,两组数据之间的差异不具有显著性（p =0.306（0.05）,8个差值均位于95％一致性界限以内.研究结论认为,（V）O2max乔治预测法和实验室测试法一致性较好,采用跑步经济性测量相关指标基于乔治预测法测量评估（V）O2max比较可靠,评估结果可以达到实验室测试法的效果.
본연구목적주요탐색채용포보경제성측량상관지표기우교치예측법평고최대섭양량（（V）O2max）적가고성.연구사로통과Bland-Altman방법래비교（V）O2max교치예측법화실험실측시법적일치성.연구대상선택8명수과량호중장포훈련적운동계학생,수시자적기본정황：년령（21.50±0.53）세、신고（172.2±3.89）cm、체중（63.2±3.72）kg.제일천측시（V）O2max,격일재포태이차최대강도하측시포보경제성상관지표（섭양량、심솔、체중등）.연구결과발현,통과교치예측법고산획득8명수시자적（V）O2max치비실험측시치략고,단통과배대양본t검험발현,량조수거지간적차이불구유현저성（p =0.306（0.05）,8개차치균위우95％일치성계한이내.연구결론인위,（V）O2max교치예측법화실험실측시법일치성교호,채용포보경제성측량상관지표기우교치예측법측량평고（V）O2max비교가고,평고결과가이체도실험실측시법적효과.
Based on Bland -Ahman method, this study was to compare the VO2max results by ＂George prediction method＂ and the laboratory measurement. We have selected eight weU - trained students who major in middle distance running as the research subjects. The basic situation of the subjects： age （21.50 ± 0.53） years, height （172.2 ± 3.89） cm, and the weight （63.2 ± 3.72） kg. We tested the VO2max at the first day, and then tested the running economy （RE） related heart rate at alternate days. The results showed that the VO2max value of ＂George prediction method＂is slightly higher than the value of laboratory measurement, but by the paired samples t- test, the difference between the two methods were not significant （p = 0.306 〉 0.05 ）. All 8 differences were located on the 95% consistency limits. So, the consistency between ＂George prediction method＂ and laboratory measurement was better. This study concluded that the differences between ＂George prediction method＂ and laboratory measurement were not significant. The consistency between the two methods was better.