中国法学
中國法學
중국법학
China Legal Science
2015年
3期
60~79
,共null页
网络诽谤 捏造事实诽谤他人 情节严重 告诉的才处理
網絡誹謗 捏造事實誹謗他人 情節嚴重 告訴的纔處理
망락비방 날조사실비방타인 정절엄중 고소적재처리
司法解释关于“明知是捏造的损害他人名誉的事实,在信息网络上散布,情节恶劣的,以‘捏造事实诽谤他人’论”的规定,属于平义解释而非类推解释。作为诽谤罪对象的“他人”并不排斥公众人物,但根据我国宪法的规定,刑法必须适当降低对公众人物名誉的保护规格。司法解释关于网络诽谤“情节严重”规定的缺陷,不在于客观归罪与扩大处罚范围,而在于不当缩小了网络诽谤的处罚范围。“告诉的才处理”并不意味着必须由被害人自诉,而是指不得违反被害人的意愿进入刑事诉讼程序。
司法解釋關于“明知是捏造的損害他人名譽的事實,在信息網絡上散佈,情節噁劣的,以‘捏造事實誹謗他人’論”的規定,屬于平義解釋而非類推解釋。作為誹謗罪對象的“他人”併不排斥公衆人物,但根據我國憲法的規定,刑法必鬚適噹降低對公衆人物名譽的保護規格。司法解釋關于網絡誹謗“情節嚴重”規定的缺陷,不在于客觀歸罪與擴大處罰範圍,而在于不噹縮小瞭網絡誹謗的處罰範圍。“告訴的纔處理”併不意味著必鬚由被害人自訴,而是指不得違反被害人的意願進入刑事訴訟程序。
사법해석관우“명지시날조적손해타인명예적사실,재신식망락상산포,정절악렬적,이‘날조사실비방타인’론”적규정,속우평의해석이비유추해석。작위비방죄대상적“타인”병불배척공음인물,단근거아국헌법적규정,형법필수괄당강저대공음인물명예적보호규격。사법해석관우망락비방“정절엄중”규정적결함,불재우객관귀죄여확대처벌범위,이재우불당축소료망락비방적처벌범위。“고소적재처리”병불의미착필수유피해인자소,이시지불득위반피해인적의원진입형사소송정서。
According to the Judicial Interpretation on Several Issues concerning the Defamation through Information Networks, whoever knowingly spreads the facts fabricated to damage another person' s reputation on an information network shall, if the circumstances are execrable, be deemed as having " fabricated facts to defame another person " This interpretation is a literal interpretation instead of an analogical interpretation. person" that is defamed in the above provision does not exclude public figures, according to the Constitution Law of China, the Criminal Law protection level of public figures' reputation. There are interpretation regarding what circumstances shall be deemed as shall have to duly " Another however, lower the imperfections regarding the "serious circumstance", but those imperfections lie not in the objective incrimination or over extension of punishment scope as disputed, but in the unduly restricting the punishment scope of defamation through information networks. "Cases of private prosecution" does not mean such case can only be prosecuted by the victim; instead, it only means such case cannot be brought into criminal procedure violating the victim's willingness.