中国法学
中國法學
중국법학
China Legal Science
2015年
3期
265~283
,共null页
寻衅滋事罪 保护法益 行为类型 主观违法要素
尋釁滋事罪 保護法益 行為類型 主觀違法要素
심흔자사죄 보호법익 행위류형 주관위법요소
寻衅滋事罪是我国刑法中一个51人注目的罪名,近年来本罪存在着口袋化的倾向,因此,对本罪的法教义学研究十分必要。本文以我国《刑法》第293条以及司法解释关于寻衅滋事罪的规定为根据,对起哄闹事型寻衅滋事罪的规范构造、司法认定以及网络传谣等问题进行了理论探究。本文从保护法益、行为类型和主观违法要素三个方面,对起哄闹事型寻衅滋事罪进行了规范考察;结合案例,从刑法教义学出发对起哄闹事型寻衅滋事罪的具体行为类型进行了分析;并对网络寻衅滋事罪的司法解释进行了研究;对网络传谣行为不能等同于起哄闹事,因此不能以寻衅滋事罪论处的结论进行了论证。
尋釁滋事罪是我國刑法中一箇51人註目的罪名,近年來本罪存在著口袋化的傾嚮,因此,對本罪的法教義學研究十分必要。本文以我國《刑法》第293條以及司法解釋關于尋釁滋事罪的規定為根據,對起鬨鬧事型尋釁滋事罪的規範構造、司法認定以及網絡傳謠等問題進行瞭理論探究。本文從保護法益、行為類型和主觀違法要素三箇方麵,對起鬨鬧事型尋釁滋事罪進行瞭規範攷察;結閤案例,從刑法教義學齣髮對起鬨鬧事型尋釁滋事罪的具體行為類型進行瞭分析;併對網絡尋釁滋事罪的司法解釋進行瞭研究;對網絡傳謠行為不能等同于起鬨鬧事,因此不能以尋釁滋事罪論處的結論進行瞭論證。
심흔자사죄시아국형법중일개51인주목적죄명,근년래본죄존재착구대화적경향,인차,대본죄적법교의학연구십분필요。본문이아국《형법》제293조이급사법해석관우심흔자사죄적규정위근거,대기홍료사형심흔자사죄적규범구조、사법인정이급망락전요등문제진행료이론탐구。본문종보호법익、행위류형화주관위법요소삼개방면,대기홍료사형심흔자사죄진행료규범고찰;결합안례,종형법교의학출발대기홍료사형심흔자사죄적구체행위류형진행료분석;병대망락심흔자사죄적사법해석진행료연구;대망락전요행위불능등동우기홍료사,인차불능이심흔자사죄론처적결론진행료론증。
The crime of instigating quarrels is an attractive crime in the special part of the Criminal Law of the PRC. In recent years, its scope of application has been increasingly expanded. Therefore, it is rather necessary to make doctrinal analysis of this crime. Based on the article 293 of the Criminal Law of the PRC and relevant judicial interpretations, this article makes a theoretical inquiry into the normative structure, judicial application and the conduct of instigating quarrels in the Internet. This article makes a normative analysis on the crime of instigating quarrels from the protected interests, modes of conduct and subjective wrongful element. Based on the cases, this article makes analysis on the modes of conduct of the crime of instigating quarrels from the perspective of doctrinal criminal law, which is significant for the establishment of a right legal image of the crime of instigating quarrels. This article also analyzes the judicial interpretation concerning the instigating quarrels in Internet. By analyzing the two different views on whether the behavior of disseminating rumors on Internet should be convicted of the crime of instigating quarrels, this article argues that the behavior of disseminating rumors on Internet cannot be subsumed as instigating quarrels therefore should be convicted of the crime of instigating quarrels.